User talk:Romanski

Pentode and Pentagrid Converter
It is a literary device alluding to the fact that a Pentode is an unlikely choice of valve to function as a frequency converter. It has been there for some time, and most of the vacuum tube savy contributors seem to be happy with it. I B Wright 12:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

commons:User:Romanski
I assert to be the same user as commons:User:Romanski --Romanski 11:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Urwumpe needs you
Go on, help him out. Check out your village pump. Quite vague, I know. You should be able to figure out what I mean though. Prodego talk  01:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that! :) --Romanski (talk) 08:43, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I B Wright – what's up with that guy?
Hi. After a rather unpleasant, grueling experience with I B Wright (and what currently seems to be his alter ego, 86.182.66.217) on my talk page and elsewhere, I decided to take a look at the history of his talk page and and wasn't too surprised to find that he clashed with many other users in the past, you among them.

And while I think it was wrong of some of you to threaten him with being blocked (for tendentious editing, personal attacks, harassment or whatever), he's really damaging Wikipedia, putting falsehoods in article after article (I'm still not sure as to why he does what he does: Is he really serious, or is this all some kind of a very bad joke? Or maybe he's got some, um, "other issues" to deal with?). Isn't there anything that can be done short of revoking his editing rights (which already had been tried once before)? Couldn't it be arranged that his changes must be approved by someone higher up before they are applied? Oh, well, that's probably not feasible, still, it's comforting to see that I'm not the only one who's had a close encounter of the third kind with this unnerving guy... Thanks!

By the way, did you ever read the self-description on his user page?


 * "[...]he has a wide ranging knowledge on some often surprising subjects. Note: I B Wright is not his real name, but an apposite if modest description."

It doesn't get much more disconnected from reality than that.

Regards – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 21:37, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Optimal mechanism


The article Optimal mechanism has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. rsjaffe talk  23:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)