User talk:Romasun41

Welcome!
Hello, Romasun41, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Platform, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! VViking Talk Edits 13:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Platform


A tag has been placed on Draft:Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Platform, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. VViking Talk Edits 13:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Dear @Viewmont Viking, I am very sorry for the misuse done of the Wiki, namely for not providing quality content which resulted advertising or promotion. Please allow me to explain:
 * I am an external consultant for the not-for-profit research institutions developing and managing MEL collaborative platform, in particular ICARDA. We DO NOT have any promotional/selling objective as we work in the public research for development sector for the advancement of human research on sustainable crops and agricultural practices.
 * The platform object of the deleted article is not sold, disseminated, or otherwise shared for profit purposes, it is instead a collaborative tool co-developed by CGIAR research institutions and provided free of charge to advanced research institutions which partner for development internationally. The platform is a technological and collaborative achievement and the article about it wanted to make public its existence in an informative way, like the GitHub article does for the related collaborative tool.
 * What basically happened here, is that I have never written a Wikipedia article before and could not create a page that was in line with Wikipedia standards. Also a former colleague of mine had tried to submit articles about the aforementioned tool, but could not succeed. I am picking up where my former colleague left.
 * I am very sorry for this and would like to appeal for a request to retrieve the article to be foundamentally corrected, and request some guidance for the correct way forward to proceed to start from scratch and do things the right way.
 * Thank you! Romasun41 (talk) 12:48, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 16:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)