User talk:Romazan

Fear of a Red Planet Level01
Hi - I noticed you created the above article, and that it is referred to to simply as "Fear of a Red Planet" in the body of the article. I'm wondering if the page needs to be moved to a different title, ie. "Fear of a Red Planet"? If you are a new editor, you will not be able to move the article until you are auto-confirmed. If you'd like this article moved, let me know - I don't know enough about the subject to guess! You also might like like to look at WP:NSONG, which discusses notability criteria for songs. I have added some links for new users below, in case they are helpful to you. -- Kateshort forbob  15:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, reading further, I see it is listed a couple of places in Wikipedia with the "Level01" ending, and the next song has "Level 02" appended, whilst outside Wikipedia, I can't see that title. Consider me confused!-- Kateshort forbob  15:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style


 * Hi Romazan. Thanks for your message. Since there is currently no other article of the same name, I have moved the article to Fear of a Red Planet per the instructions at WP:SONG. Thanks for your links to more information; that box set sounds interesting - I'll have to read about it! -- Kateshort  forbob  10:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi again. That sentence is commonly known as a tag or template, which another user, Quantpole, has added to the article. The page isn't under imminent threat of deletion, but someone may decide to delete or redirect it if they think it doesn't meet our guidelines. The guideline on notability for music related topics is WP:MUSIC. Ideally, the article should cite independent, reliable sources, eg. magazines or newspapers that wrote about the song. The link you added is useful, but it is a primary source (I assume the band's website was created by the band, or someone in their management) - a secondary source would be better. It doesn't have to be on the Internet; books and print magazines are perfectly acceptable, although if information is available about modern subjects, it can generally be found somewhere on the Internet!


 * I'm not an expert on music articles, but what often seems to happen is that an article will be written on an album and the page for each song will be redirected to the album article, so that when someone searches for a song, they will be taken to the album article, which will hopefully have all the important information about all the songs. For example, I picked one of our featured articles, Loveless (album) at random. If you try searching for one of the songs, Only Shallow, you will be sent to the album. If the album is also known as "Fear of a Red Planet", what you could do is re-use the same page, changing the information to talk about the album instead, and creating redirects to point all of the titles of song to the album article.


 * Please let me know if you need any help with anything, or I've said something that doesn't make sense, as I've rambled on a bit here! If I don't know the answer, hopefully I can point you in the right direction. -- Kateshort forbob  15:35, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of What Do You See (single)
I have nominated What Do You See (single), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/What Do You See (single). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan (talk) 16:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Misery Loves Company (Red Flag song)


The article Misery Loves Company (Red Flag song) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * If the article is not notable, it ought to be deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:18, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Unleash All Hell


The article Unleash All Hell has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 19:11, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of My Door Is Open


The article My Door Is Open has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 12:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Caveat Emptor (album)


The article Caveat Emptor (album) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced since 2016"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JW 1961  Talk  22:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CauseEffect 1990 album.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:CauseEffect 1990 album.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sunrise EP CaE.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sunrise EP CaE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)