User talk:Rommel Paul

Al Pacino
"Yes it is" what???? If you do not stop returning content that is supported by a DEAD LINK, which makes it invalid, and content referring to Pacino as "widely regarded" with one reference to a Channel4 viewer poll that is subject to multiple voting by those that cast votes and is therefore unscientific and inherently flawed, I will take this directly to WP:AN/I and report it as vandalism and then launch a sock puppet investigation regarding two very new accounts backing each other and an anonymous IP up. Wonder what that will show? Neither of you, or you as the case may be, have bothered to respond on the article talk page, although from your endless and cut off edit summaries, it is quite apparent you've read it. This is not a battle you can win. Calling anyone the greatest, or one of the greatest, is inherently POV and unencyclopedic and is not supported by Wikipedia policies. Stop. Just stop. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)