User talk:RonGrail

Link spam
I have reverted your external link additions per WP:LINKSPAM. --William Graham talk 18:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Mhking (talk) 18:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia. --Mhking (talk) 18:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I was just going to advise you that TWOP is a fan site but it seems you've been warned to stop. Your edits to Desperate Housewives were reverted.IrishLass (talk) 18:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop spamming Wikipedia with "televisionwithoutpity" links. The page seems to be a (your?) blog, and we normallly don't link to such websites. Thank you. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. IrishGuy talk 20:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Television Without Pity links
TWOP is a forum-based site that uses individual user-written articles as the basis for its recaps/reviews of programs. This violates both the Wikipedia provisions regarding original research as well as the qualifications for outside links. As such, they are not suitable for inclusions as outside links. The continued placement of these links violates WP guidelines. You were asked multiple times not to place the links, yet you continued. Your temporary banning was as a result of both the rule violations coupled with your refusal to cease placing the links when asked multiple times. --Mhking (talk) 16:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, looks like I have been wrong when I suspected that the page was your blog; in fact the website contains a blog, but it is by no means the main part of the content. I don't think that I can appropriately judge its merits (though mass-adding the link to articles despita being asked not to wasn't exactly likely to make me or others give you a benefit of doubt); may I suggest that you go to WikiProject External links, and put the external link for consideration? (Also, it is possible that you are affiliated with the website; in that case, please read our guidelines about conflict of interest.) Regards, Mike Rosoft (talk) 16:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)