User talk:Ron Vos

Hi Ron. Your recent edits are very welcome, but I hope you don't mind me offering a few suggestions. Generally, Wikipedia article changes shouldn't be left in an obviously unfinished state, because it is a live encyclopedia that people are using all the time (though in a sense, Wikipedia articles are always unfinished). If other editors see unfinished changes they are very likely to finish/move/correct, or even revert them. So if we make small edits, what we should really do is Preview them and not actually submit them until they are finished - until they are in the correct format and location, for example.

If we want to make larger edits that we cannot complete quickly, it's best to do the edits elsewhere and save them, and only submit them when we have been able to finish them. What some people do is copy the article text to a word processor, and work on it until they're happy with it - perhaps occasionally pasting it back into Wikipedia to Preview it (but not submit it) and see how it's going. But what many pefer (I do) is to create a User page - in this case you could create User:Ron Vos/Myrtos, copy the original Myrtos article there, and then you have all the time you need to work on it before you resubmit it to the original article. When you're happy, go back to the original article and check if there have been any other changes since you started, and update your copy if necessary. Then paste in your whole new text, Preview it, and submit it as a finished article. (And you can request your User:Ron Vos/Myrtos page is then deleted - just blanking the page should bring it to the attention of an admin who will deal with it).

So when you say "Tonight I will start to expand it and write the history section, it may take several hours, so please, with all respect, be patient", I'd suggest you write it all offline (using a word processor?) and only actually add it to the article when you're happy it's finished and ready for people to read - and I look forward to reading it myself.

If there's anything I can help with, please do feel free to ask on my Talk page and I'll be happy to do what I can. Again, welcome to Wikipedia - I hope your stay here is long and enjoyable.

Boing!  said Zebedee  05:10, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Myrtos
Hi Ron, that's nice work. I've done a bit of copy-editing on it for layout, grammar, spacing etc - but you made that easy as it was pretty good to start with. Just a few things... All in all, it's a good article. Boing!  said Zebedee  15:24, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * References need to be links to or descriptions of actual sources, so instead of saying "Research: Ron Vos" you would need to refer to the actual sources of your research - see WP:OR. I've removed those references now. If you can find any online references you can cite, that would be great - I'll have a look for some myself when I have time.
 * Though the "Greek English" spelling may indeed be be 'Mirtos', the generally accepted spelling in English appears to be split between that and 'Myrtos' (Google finds slightly more occurrences of 'Myrtos' than 'Mirtos'). Other Wikipedia articles use 'Myrtos', so as a precedent has been set I think we really need to standardise on that.
 * Traffic stats are nice - once people see someone is making changes to an article, they'll read it :-)

I've edited the Traffic section now - it was good and didn't need much work. Best regards -- Boing!   said Zebedee  04:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Goddess.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Goddess.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:51, 4 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:51, 4 February 2010 (UTC)