User talk:Ron vrooman

May 2016
You list information such as sovereign citizen' an oxymoron pin to patriots such as myself. with no accreditation? I corrected this. Wikipedia published information from one side of the discussion only. I eliminated it as it was biased and served no purpose here. You have pride of authorship for inaccurate, deceiving information. Each word that is disparaging to the 4 organic laws of our Constitutional Republic is repugnant to we the people. several articles and the Oklahoma Bomber all side with the thought we the people that are in the patriot movement against color of law government are marginalized. Then print opinion as fact when re printing what some one wrote as an opinion that was published. Come on, this is all about freedom as we are guaranteed by our founding documents. Government of the US comes after the states and the states come after the people. Read the fucking documents. Correct fucking to be fu*8ing, for your PC self and Wikipedia. I do not have that symbol

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sovereign citizen movement. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   16:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Private attorney general, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   16:44, 8 May 2016 (UTC)