User talk:Ronald2002

January 2009
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Deconstructhis (talk) 10:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Uhhh, I did use some harsh terms, but they were warranted. Do not insult me by saying I was trying to "lighten up" this website. Perhaps you should encourage people to discuss serious issues more instead of coming on here mainly to discuss pop culture. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronald2002 (talk • contribs)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Deconstructhis (talk) 03:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Deconstructhis (talk) 03:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi--

Why do you not censor the other editor's statement that Crump is "the voice of reason on the show"? That statement lies atop the premise that the advertised tenets of her worldview are true. By censoring me, you're saying that my worldview is untrue. Now, if you're going to speak to me in this way, fine, but you need to do so on a CONSISTENT basis and not endorse the worldview that the other editor endorses.