User talk:Ronald Blake

Welcome!
Hello, Ronald Blake, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Cain's Jawbone does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AntiDionysius (talk) 03:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Self-published sources
Hi there, I see the above editor has already restored my content removal and given you some links about WP:NPOV. I suggest also having a look at the relevant part of the reliable sources policy at WP:RSSELF. Sorry about removing your very first edit! If you have any further questions or want help editing something else, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. -- asilvering (talk) 06:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's policy against personal attacks and harassment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.
 * This is a collaborative project. Intimidating and browbeating your colleagues is way out of line. Cullen328 (talk) 08:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

I tend to agree with you that intimidation and browbeating are a problem but the notions are irrelevant to anything that has taken place here. Rather, commercial interests should hold no place on wikipedia. If there was a problem with anything I may or may not have written, then a page header seeking correction and further input would have been the proper course of action - not the complete annihilation of a person's input. That is not a collaborative project. That! is bullying, and it is censorship. You see, Cullen, conflict is often a complex issue that involves more than one person's point of view, but choosing to hear one side only is neither objective, informative, nor helpful. And shutting down debate is inexcusable. I hesitate to add but such practices are a primary reason why Britannica, along with many other sites, are gaining on wikipedia for search engine results. You may shoot the messenger if it makes you happy, but doing so won't solve the problem. Anyway, I'm done here. Accept or reject anything you like. It is no longer my concern. Ronald Blake (talk) 02:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)