User talk:Ronald E. Mixer

Talk:Strategic Air Command
It is extremely rude to blank pages in that manner. &mdash;Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 22:45, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to List of Strategic Air Command wings
Your recent edit to List of Strategic Air Command wings (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 18:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AnnH ♫ 23:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I saw you hadn't been welcomed earlier, so I thought I'd give you a welcome. AnnH ♫ 23:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Advice
Hi, Ronald. I sometimes look at Special:Contributions/Tawkerbot4 to help me to find vandals that I can revert. The bot, of course, is not infallible, but does an extremely good job, and if I click on the contributions of someone that the bot has reverted, I often find other examples of vandalism. That was what led me to your page. I see that you blanked an article, on the grounds that it was a duplicate of another article. The bot is programmed to revert any massive page blankings, and of course, is not capable of reading your motives, so reverted you. You then explained your reasoning here. I don't know anything about the subject, so I have no opinion as to which article should be the "real one", but if you are convinced that Article A should not exist because the information in Article B is the same, and you think that Article B has a more appropriate content, then you should redirect Article A to Article B. To redirect a page, open the edit box, delete the whole contents, and type in:
 * #REDIRECT Name of article you want to redirect to

and then save the page.

For example Bread soda currently redirects to Sodium bicarbonate. If you click on the link for Bread soda it will take you to the article on Sodium bicarbonate, but it will say near the top of the page "Redirected from Bread soda. If you get to the sodium bicarbonate page through a redirection from bread soda, rather than directly, you can click on "bread soda" (where it says "redirected from", and then click on "edit this page" to see what it looks like in the source.

Hope that helps. But remember I do not endorse (or disendorse) redirecting the article, as I have no knowledge of the situation. This is just to tell you how to redirect; it's not telling you that you should!

Cheers. AnnH ♫ 23:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)