User talk:Ronald Galope Barniso

About Polysports Complex
What is non notable?!

Source for your articles
Those articles really, really need sources. Please see WP:42. If references are not found, the article risks deletion.

You are new here and I do not want you to be disappointed.

If there is anything you need or have any questions, please ask. Thank you, and happy editing. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:21, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Robinsons Place Butuan-Logo.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robinsons Place Butuan-Logo.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Urios Arena for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Urios Arena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Urios Arena until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 14:37, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Main Fire from Polysports.jpg
There's a watermark of a company at the bottom right of File:Main Fire from Polysports.jpg. Is that your company? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to User:Spacecowboy420 can easily be misinterpreted. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. ''There is no administrative process where a user's account would be deleted. Regardless, don't threaten another user with that happening.'' —C.Fred (talk) 13:33, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

===Hi, C.Fred those articles that I edited except for the users are safe. Those are the good articles. And I don't know how to protect those articles like Butuanon people article. Wikipedia is not for deleting articles from Butuan, we do our job to protect our articles. Please, do not insult us.


 * What do you mean, "your job"? Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Content may be freely edited by the entire community of editors. Articles should also be written from neutral point of view, not necessarily favoring the viewpoint of a certain community. And any material that does not meet Wikipedia guidelines may be removed—and that includes images which violate copyright. —C.Fred (talk) 13:57, 13 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Yeah its free, but all articles and photos will be deleted. Please stop posting about warnings of our articles because its insult to our people. Please stop deleting everything about our rights. Our article was safe.


 * All articles and photos will not necessarily be deleted. That said, if a photo is taken from another site on the web without permission, then Wikipedia must delete it out of respect for the photographer and/or rights holder. If an article does not meet the criteria for notability—the same criteria that apply to every article—then it may be deleted or merged. It is not an insult to a group to apply the same standards to article about their region that apply to other articles. (It would almost be insulting to give the articles a free pass, because it would imply that editors from that region aren't capable of meeting the standards that apply to the rest of the encyclopedia!) —C.Fred (talk) 14:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Some help
I want to help you learn a little about wikipedia, so you can make some edits without getting everything deleted or your account blocked.

Firstly, please be a little careful how you talk to people. This place is super polite, we can't threaten or demand anything. Civility Also, we can't talk about taking legal action. No legal threats Those things will get an editor blocked from editing.

We have to be really careful about copyright, especially with images. We can't find an image online and use it, unless the copyright allows us to use it. Try reading this Image use policy it has a lot of the rules about which images we can use.

Also, if you have a strong connection to a subject, then it's a conflict of interest. You can read about it here - Conflict of interest

Lots of the other rules are here: List_of_policies

I'm not trying to tell you what to do, I'm just suggesting that you read those policies, because it will make your time here much easier. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 14:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butuan Polysports Complex. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Oh! I'm sorry for that. It's a mistake.

Nomination of Butuan Polysports Basketball Arena for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Butuan Polysports Basketball Arena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Butuan Polysports Basketball Arena until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Butuan Polysports Baseball Park for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Butuan Polysports Baseball Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Butuan Polysports Baseball Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Butuan Polysports Football Stadium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Butuan Polysports Football Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Butuan Polysports Football Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your Pictures
You say that all pictures you have taken are owned by you. If this is so, these do not belong on Wikipedia. If you put a picture on Wikipedia, you are automatically putting the picture in the Public Domain. But, if you want to keep ownership of these pictures, Do not put them on Wikipedia. Thank you. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Notability
I do not have any sort of grudge against you. If you do not know what the notability policy is, then you have WP:COMPENTENCE issues. You need to read WP:N, and WP:GNG ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 13:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Photos
If you say you "own" these pictures, I will have to delete them. Only fair-use or public domain images can be uploaded on Wikipedia.ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 14:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC) On an unrelated note, readWP:OWN. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 15:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Technically, yes, the user does "own" them. However, he's granted the world the right to use the image in any way possible, including commercial reuse. So while he does technically own them, that ownership no longer grants any control over use of the images. —C.Fred (talk) 00:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Something important
Hi Ronald Galope Barniso! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, Wikipedia is built on collaboration: we all work together in a peaceful manner. If you don't mind, for the moment I would suggest you to pause your edits and read a bit of the rules. But if you find reading the rules boring you can try this out: The Wikipedia Adventure. This is a good interactive way to learn the rules. Would you like to try this? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 19:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

A note about copyright and text
I had to revert this edit to Father Saturnino Urios University because it was copied wholesale from the school's website. Wikipedia cannot reuse large chunks of copyrighted text in that manner. —C.Fred (talk) 01:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Removing posts from article talk pages
Hi Ronald Galope Barniso. Editors are pretty much free to remove posts from their user talk pages except for certain things as they see fit per WP:UP, but it is generally not considered acceptable to remove/edit comments other editors have made on article talk page like you did with this edit at Talk:Father Saturnino Urios University. Article talk pages are places where editors can discuss ways to improve articles; in other words, they are a community page, So, unless there is a specific policy-based reason for removing or editing another editor's post (see WP:TPO for examples), it simply should not be done at all. If you continue to do things such as this, you are likely going to find your actions being discussed at WP:ANI which in turn may lead to an administrator deciding to block you for disruptive editing. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Did you remove the article that I edited? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronald Galope Barniso (talk • contribs) 10:51, 17 May 2016‎ (UTC+9)
 * I am not an administrator so I cannot delete articles or files. Any editor, however, remove content from articles that they feel does not comply with policies and guidelines, and any editor can nominate articles for deletion or speedy deletion that they feel do not comply with Wikipedia's relevant policies and guidelines. Just for reference, editors do not own the articles they create or edit, so anything one editor does can be easily undone by another. When that happens, the best thing to typically do is discuss try and discuss things with the other editor per WP:BRD. If you are concerned about article you are creating being nominated for deletion, then perhaps you should try using Wikipedia:Articles for creation instead. AfC reviewers examine drafts and give advice on how they can be improved so that they better comply with relevant policies and guidelines, thus making them less likely to be nominated for deletion.
 * None of the above, however, is really related to removing the article talk page posts of others. Wikipedia editing is about trying to collaborate with others and reach a consensus over what content should be included in articles in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. Article talk pages are for discussing such things so inappropriately removing posts does nothing to foster discussion. Wikipedia is not about winning or getting revenge against other editors who may disagree with you by removing their posts. As I posted above, this is not typically something considered appropriate by the Wikipedia community, and is something you should avoid doing unless you have a very good policy-based reason for doing so. If you continue do such things without proper justification, other editors might start assuming that you are more interested in your own personal goals than in helping to improve the overall quality of the encyclopedia. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Open Time
This user talk page opens @ 8:00-11:30am, and 1:30-4:30pm PST Ronald Galope Barniso (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your Editing
Can you please read over Wikipedia guidelines? A good place to start would be WP:N, WP:V, and WP:PILLARS. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 15:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your user page.
Hi Ronand Galope Barniso. There may be a problem with User:Ronald Galope Barniso because of WP:FAKEARTICLE. Editors are given a bit of latitude when it comes to their user pages, but all user pages are required to comply with Wikipedia:User pages. Generally, it's not a good idea to post drafts or anything else which might be mistaken for an article on your user page because it could could be removed by an administrator or another editor per WP:UP. Even though it is your user page, you do not own it so it can be edited by anyone if they feel it violates relevant policies and guidelines. Generally, experienced editors will refrain from editing your user page, unless there is a serious policy/guideline violation that requires attention, but you should be aware that it can happen. There is a better place for you to post your drafts, etc. which is considered acceptable by Wikipedia. You can create WP:USERSUBPAGE for things you are working. This will keep your drafts, etc. separate from your main user page. It's fairly easy to do and you can create as many as you need. You can also add Template:User sandbox to the top of the page to ensure reader's do not mistake in for an article. User subpages are still required to satisfy Wikipedia's user page guidelines, but as long as you avoid posting anything which violates WP:UP, WP:COPYVIO or WP:BLP, your subpages will most likely be left alone by other editors. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)


 * so, I will remove it?
 * Not sure if you're asking me a question. You can remove it or you can move it to your user sandbox at User:Ronald Galope Barniso/sandbox or you can create a special subpage for it at User:Ronald Galope Barniso/subpage. Instead of "subpage", just pick a page name that you like. When you've moved it, just add Template:User sandbox or Template:Userspace draft to the top of the page, so that others know it is a practice page you're using for drafts and other stuff. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)


 * OK. Thanks for that.

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Ronald Galope Barniso, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Father Saturnino Urios University has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Amoranto Sports Complex.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Amoranto Sports Complex.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:11, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Valentina Plaza.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Valentina Plaza.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:19, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use files
Hi Roland Galope Barniso. One of the 10 non-free content criteria listed in WP:NFCCP is WP:NFCC. This basically says that a non-free image is only acceptable when there is no way for a freely licensed image which serves the same encyclopedic purpose to be created. This does not only mean that freely licensed version doesn't not currently exist or cannot be found somewhere online; it also means that there is no reasonable hope that a freely licensed version will ever be created. In the case of File:Amoranto Sports Complex.jpg, this stadium still seems to exist. Therefore, it is possible for someone to go there at take a photo of it, and then freely license that photo for use on Wikipedia. The same applies to File:Valentina Plaza.jpg: Maria Valentina Plaza is still living so it is possible for someone somewhere to take her picture and then freely license it for use on Wikipedia, etc. Non-free photos of living persons or existing buildings, etc. that you find on the Internet are almost never allowed because of NFCC#1. If you, however, feel that there is some reason these two particular photos should be allowed as non-free, please follow the instructions in the template I have added to each file. Finally, Wikipedia's non-free content policy can be hard to understand in certain cases, so it might be a good idea to ask for assistance at WP:MCQ before uploading any other similar photos as non-free. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:31, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Cahk. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Ronald Galope Barniso that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 10:36, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for threats and intimidation
I have indefinitely blocked this account for engaging in death threats and intimidation. Wikipedia strives to be a collaborative and neutral environment, you comments violates both of those goals. HighInBC 13:44, 27 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi. Unblock my editing account, I don't want foreign people who edit our source about Urios University, please Unblock my account.

Why did you say Islamic person? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:01, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I am not from Islamic State or ISIL.
 * Neither are 99.99% of Muslims. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
 * Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Regarding "deleting" accounts
We don't delete accounts. The closest options we have are for users who are not blocked. Your only options are to either accept this block or to successfully appeal it. Your only chance is probably the Standard offer:


 * 1) Wait at least six months
 * 2) Make an appeal that shows that you know exactly what you did wrong and let us know how you will never do that again
 * 3) Do not give us any other reason to be concerned (like those anti-Islamic comments you included in your last unblock request)

This is not guaranteed to work, but anything else is guaranteed to not work. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Spacecowboy420 (talk) 09:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

HighInBC
What is your real name is? And why are you going to block me Forever? Spacecowboy420 remove and deletes all sources and articles based on Father Saturnino Urios University! Why can you just go to the Philippines that who is Ronald Galope Barniso?! If you are the english wikipedian, please do not block me and informed Spacecowboy420 that do not remove or delete any sources about the FSUU!!! Please orient us!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronald Galope Barniso (talk • contribs)
 * Wikipedians do not have to reveal their identities if they don't want to. The only chance you have of being unblocked requires that you:
 * 1. Wait six months without creating any sockpuppet accounts.
 * 2. Appeal the block with a message that explains what you did wrong and what you will do to avoid those mistakes again.
 * 3. Do not pretend that it was Spacecowboy420's fault or anyone else's fault but your own. It would also help if you promised to never edit the Father Saturnino Urios University article ever again.
 * Otherwise, you are going to remain blocked. The only reason you retain access to your talk page is so that you can potentially appeal your block.  If that becomes completely hopeless we can revoke talk page access.  Ian.thomson (talk) 13:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * NO!!! Spacecowboy saying: FSUU is a Minor University. How dare is he?! and why are you going to unblock my account immediately? Or why can you go to the Philippines to orient us about wikipedia, if not, I will get angry at you.!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronald Galope Barniso (talk • contribs)
 * Your anger is what got you blocked in the first place -- it's a serious problem that you need to work on. Your only choices at this point are:
 * A) Wait six months, explain what you did wrong without blaming others, and promise not to cause trouble.
 * B) Stay angry and blocked forever.
 * You will not accomplish anything with option B. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I will go option C to talk with Rodrigo Duterte when he's arriving in Butuan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronald Galope Barniso (talk • contribs)
 * He has no more authority or control over Wikipedia than you do, so that's really sounding like option B. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * DILI KO!!! I want Option C !!! DUTERTE!!! DUTERTE!!! PARA SA TUNAY NA PAGBABAGO!!! If Rodrigo Duterte arrives in Butuan, I will talk to him . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronald Galope Barniso (talk • contribs)
 * Ok, option B (with talk page access revoked) it is then. When you want to behave in a sane and civilized manner, you can try appealing your block at WP:UTRS. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Timber City Academy Logo.jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Timber City Academy Logo.jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:The Polysports Complex.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Polysports Complex.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:24, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Polysports Gym.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Polysports Gym.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:24, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:PNP-Corolla.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PNP-Corolla.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Ninja 650 r.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ninja 650 r.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Butuan Polysports Baseball Park.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Butuan Polysports Baseball Park.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Butuan Polysports Baseball Park.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Butuan Polysports Baseball Park.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Polysports Complex Logo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Polysports Complex Logo.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Robinsons Place Butuan-Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Robinsons Place Butuan-Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)