User talk:Ronaldomundo

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thanks for doing some much-needed copy-editing! Mak (talk)  21:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

As Mak says, copyediting is welcome, but please ensure you follow Wikipedia's style guide, particularly when it comes to quote marks and punctuation - see WP:MOS. Punctuation marks should only be placed inside the quote marks when it is part of the quote itself. I've just spent some time undoing a number of your changes to Henry Purcell becuase of this. Thanks, David Underdown 09:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Punctuation and Quotations
Hola! I have the same problem that you do. I want to move the closed quote outside the punctuation mark, but since this is an international English encyclopedia, they apparently like the British style better, versus the American. See:


 * Manual_of_Style
 * Manual_of_Style
 * Manual_of_Style

I am having trouble with this one myself....carry on. WikiDon 19:13, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Review of Barack Obama's status as a featured article
Barack Obama has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Stifle (talk) 17:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Wegener's
Thanks for copyediting Wegener's granulomatosis. I note that you saved your work after every edit. You might want to consider making multiple changes in the same edit, and using show preview if necessary if you want to admire the results. JFW | T@lk  21:16, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Packard
At Packard, you should incorporate multiple image so you can get some of the images from the gallery into the article like we do at Trump International Hotel & Tower (Chicago).--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Pages
This is starting to get depressing. I've been doing a lot of editing on random articles (writing seems to be a lost art), and I'm discovering that many of them have been lifted directly from other Web pages. Is this really what Wikipedia is supposed to be about? Ronaldomundo (talk) 13:51, 25 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Mind you that sometimes other pages copy Wikipedia; it can be difficult to spot the difference. Best alert others on the talk page if you suspect such abuse. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 19:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

References 2
That's if there is actual type there. But what if it says merely, "reflist" (enclosed in double braces)? Where is that list?
 * Look for where the little [2] or whatever is that refers to the bottom. Edit that bit, as that's where the actual reference is. Tombomp (talk/contribs) 13:16, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

References 3
Okay, apparently I need to be more specific. Say I'm editing the article entitled "Great Pyramid Monument," and I want to put a space between the "Niermann," and the "I." in the first reference. I click on "edit," and in the edit window is a bunch of mumbo jumbo, but not the actual copy. Where would I find said copy? Thanks for your patience.
 * Fixed it. You should have been looking for something that has somewhere in it. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 13:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Edit conflict: Inline references are just that - inline. The ''' or


 * A percentage will change the width on all sized monitors so it fits to that particular pecentage of the screen, where as pixels will be the same width on all sized monitors. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 19:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Good evening,

Thanks for the copy editing you did at Virgil Fox. Just a friendly reminder: don't forget to write an edit summary before saving your edits.

Thanks!

—BMRR (talk) 23:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. ukexpat (talk) 14:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Pretty please? – ukexpat (talk) 14:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the message. The recommendation at H:FIES is Always fill in the summary field . I assume that's for minor edits too. It is useful when looking at one's watchlist. . – ukexpat (talk) 15:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Forgive my recent revert, it didn't look constructive in the diff window. However, an edit summary would definitely be useful in the future. – xeno  ( talk ) 20:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Your copy-editing is appreciated, however. :-) Double Blue  (talk) 20:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Punctuation and quotation marks
Hello... first off, thank you for all the hard work you've put into cleaning up articles. This is all too often unappreciated, but nevertheless an essential part of the process. However, one point to keep in mind: punctuation does not go inside quotation marks when the marks are surrounding titles (such as for films or TV series) or nicknames. (This is per the style guide, specifically Manual of Style and Logical quotation.) Please feel free to ask if you have questions about this. Thanks. --Ckatz chat spy  21:52, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply; however, there are a few concerns with what you have said about your approach to punctuation:
 * "I know my practice contravenes the Style Guide"
 * I can understand your concerns; there are aspects of the MoS that irk me as well, as they differ from my customary style. However, the rules governing punctuation (as with most aspects of the MoS) serve to provide a consistent format across the entire project. As such, we do not custom-tailor punctuation to specific articles. If you have an issue with aspects of the guide, the proper approach would be to bring it up at the Style Guide discussion pages, rather than on a page-by-page basis.
 * "several billion people have the ability to change my stuff to suit themselves"
 * It is one thing if you choose to use punctuation that does not conform to the Manual of Style when you create text, such as in a new article. While it would be best to use the correct version from the start, other editors will eventually come along and adjust your new material to properly reflect the site standard. However, it is an entirely different matter to deliberately change existing punctuation away from the correct standard, as this just creates unnecessary work for others. (In the case of "MASH", I've had to spend a good twenty minutes sorting through all of your changes to individually revert the punctuation.)
 * In the long term, this will benefit your editing on Wikipedia... I happened to have the time to look through your changes and repair the punctuation issues, leaving the rest intact. However, it is likely that if you continue to make changes such as these, you will encounter situations where editors just revert the entire edit if they do not have the time to sift through each and every change. --Ckatz chat spy  19:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Tony Blair
Thank you for you good work(copy edit) at this article. Very appreciated. (Off2riorob (talk) 16:39, 27 June 2009 (UTC))

Requested move
User:Ronaldomundo → NewName &mdash; I was trying to change the title of the article from "Schrödinger's cat" to "Schrödinger's Cat", but something went awry. Help! Thanks. Ronaldomundo (talk) 19:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Schrödinger's cat
It's now back where it was. Please see WP:NC regarding capitalization of article names. --Old Moonraker (talk) 20:45, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring
If your edits are reverted, as in loudspeaker, the expected response is to discuss on the talk page, not to re-apply them again without comment.  Sp in ni ng  Spark  20:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)


 * You seem to habitually use the edit summary "Minor punctuation, spelling, and grammar corrections", but this does not accurately describe what you have been doing to this article. Most of your edits are style changes, many of which are changes to the variety of English.  See WP:ENGVAR to understand why it is wrong to do this and before you do any more.  In some cases you have caused a wikilink to redirect, eg aluminum and midrange speaker, this is also bad practice.  You might also want to take a look at WP:Words to avoid and the comments on the article talk page.  Thanks,  Sp in ni  ng  Spark  15:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry you feel you have to leave, that is certainly not the result I wanted or intended. If you change your mind I am sure there is still a lot of useful work you could do here.  Sp in ni  ng  Spark  18:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)