User talk:Ronarnold

Welcome!
Hello, Ronarnold, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Getting Started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=587157647 your edit] to Ron Arnold may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:40, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Craig Waddell, pp. 195ff, Routledge (January 1, 1998), ISBN-10: 188039328X, ISBN-13: 978-1880393284

Your Article
Hi there,

I noticed the recent cleanup work you have done on your own article (and the earlier complete overhaul you engineered) - this is against Wikipedia policy which dictates that one shouldn't edit an article about oneself in most cases.

--nosmo (talk) 17:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Is there a remedy for my violation of Wikipedia policy? I don't wish to be a scofflaw here. I've worked for newspapers and magazines a good part of my career, and I am accustomed to editors who examine my filings thoughtfully, do basic confirmation, then send it to the fact checkers, then to the legal department, then make needed changes based on those findings or call me for more information, and I see it in the next edition. If I have questions or need advice about future style, content, etc. I get good solid advice back and in substantial detail. There doesn't seem to be any system in Wikipedia for that kind of care with articles - there doesn't seem to be anybody here taking editorial responsibility for care and feeding of contributors. I donate work on other profiles here and always take the time to add explanation in my talk page edits where someone needs it. If I'm missing something, or if that is some kind of sanctified rule in the encyclopedia world, please let me know. I can cope. But I'm also a bit confused and out of my metier. I recall that Britannica used to run articles on Big Issues by the genius pushing the Big Issue, and even signed, which has fallen out of style. I'm not trying to make trouble here. I want to follow the rules and I try. I'd just like a hand with it. Ronarnold (talk) 06:17, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[Ron Arnold]