User talk:Ronaz/Archive/Archive1

= Archive1 =

Punk'd
Hi. Sorry to bother you, but I'm having some trouble on the Punk'd article. An unregistered user named BigBang19 keeps re-inserting material into the article that is irrelevant, poorly worded, etc. I've tried posting a message on that article's Talk Page, but he has not responded. Because he had no User Page, my message to him was the first one on it. If you could check out the bottommost section on the Talk Page and chime in with your two cents on his revisions, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. Nightscream 05:53, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I understand if you feel what you'd say would be redundant, but the reason I wanted you to chime in is so that if BigBang happened to read the Talk Page, that he'd see that he was in the minority, and stop what he's doing. Nightscream 16:10, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Dear Intinn,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.2 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. - Gl e n 01:13, 1 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up! Intinn | Talk 17:46, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Carefree
The edit war seems to be one anon adding what another team has adapted the lyrics to, and then another adding the subsequent response. As a Chelsea fan I know the original lyrics, but I can't verify them through reliable sources, so I think it would be best to leave it as just a stub for now. It may also be worth requesting protection for the page until something can be agreed. SteveO 16:18, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Cheers!  Intinn Talk! 16:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Original welcome by Melchoir
Strange, how has no one welcomed you yet? Well:

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Melchoir 10:07, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Thanks! FelisLeo 10:16, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * No, thanks to you! I see you've jumped right into vandal fighting; your efforts are valuable, and I appreciate them. So, like the template says, if you need any help, just ask! Melchoir 10:57, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

a- day
We were trying to do the same thing at the same time - somehow i got the word 'the' edit in after you - thanksSatuSuro 09:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Intinn! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
I fixed the approval bug from last night. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 15:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Milwaukee PC
Honestly, I'd nominate it as a prod instead of a speedy. It's not that clear cut, I don't think. But essentially, it's a regional computer retailer. Notable? Not sure. But I'd go with prod just to be on the safe side. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 10:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Jamesmh2006
hi i wanna become a wikipedian... how can i monitor recent edits etc in order to join the was against vanalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesmh2006 (talk • contribs)

Left you a message on your talk page!  Felis Leo Talk! 09:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Intinn! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: Anon Userpage Vandal 81.78.103.235
To be honest, I'm not sure. Could you point out to me what makes you think they are one, please? Thanks. &mdash;Xyrael / 09:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand how these are rather nasty (indeed, my school's filter blocked me viewing the third diff), but I don't quite understand what makes you suspect a sockpuppet 8) &mdash;Xyrael / 10:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 09:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, FelisLeo! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 17:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Numerical simulation
Hi, you have proposed the article Numerical simulation for deletion. I was not watching my talk pages for some time, so the article was already deleted when I saw your notice on my talk. In this way I couldn't do anything (e.g. improve the article) and did not see your explanation in the deletion notice.

I think Wikipedia should definitely have an article on numerical simulation, because the subject has a great importance in modern life (numerical simulations are extensively used in design of structures such as bridges, tunnels and buildings, in understanding and design of forming processes, various kinds of population models are used in predictions of epidemic spreads or macroeconomic developments, etc.) and its importance will grow increasingly. In the future this article would probably evolve into a larger article with plenty of links and images, but for the beginning a simple explanation of what numerical simulations are, with some links, would be sufficient to attract contributors who would wish to improve the article.

Now a question - is it possible to see the contents of the article after it has been deleted? is it possible to see somewhere explanation of reasons for deletion? I could use this to prepare an improved version that would match the Wikipedia standards. Ajgorhoe 09:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh
heh my first vandelism thing never thought i would live to see the day XD guess theres a first time for everythingUser:Maverick423 If It Looks Good Nuke It 20:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Yay no prob its alright =) User:Maverick423 If It Looks Good Nuke It 20:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

My edit
It shouldn't have been reverted, because I moved the POV to the other end of the spetrum, but the article actually has less POV than before. On a scale from -10 to +10, it had -8 and now has +5.
 * I can agree with you upto a certain point. The article does not come across as neutral, either way. However, even if you only edited to make your point you'd be better off adressing your NPOV concerns on the talk page rather than going ahead and making nonsense edits.  Felis Leo Talk! 21:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Criticisms of bullfighting
I agree with you that the article is probably not wholly NPOV, which tends to be the case for most articles on "causes" of one kind or another. Personally, I also have a limited tolerance for "Criticism of" articles; perhaps we should give it a different name (maybe Bullfighting and animal rights?), and it would certainly be proper to give more discussion to views that bullfighting is not inhumane. I do think, though, that the topic probably does deserve its own article, considering that the anti-bullfighting cause is a significant movement.--Pharos 22:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Donald Owens
Thanks for the heads up. I've added some more information to hopefully make the article more palatable to you. I would think that a person elected to the highest office of an international denomination with well over a million members would qualify as notable. At least as notable as say, Oak Lawn Community High School. Kevin Rector (talk) 03:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Shinsei (cigarette), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. - MrX 12:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Superdiversity‎
Hello FelisLeo. Can you reply to my question here: Talk:Superdiversity‎. BrumEduResearch (talk) 14:01, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

I have.  Felis Leo Talk! 14:05, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Apologies if I caused a problem. BrumEduResearch (talk) 14:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Not at all! The tags are there to get a good discussion going which in turn will lead to a better article.  Felis Leo Talk! 14:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I just feel under attack a bit for edits at another article and then this. See my talk page. BrumEduResearch (talk) 14:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

1967 Detroit riot
Just curious why you did this? The version you reverted looks better to me, it's apparently not vandalism, and you left no comment other than a link to Huggle. Kendall-K1 (talk) 20:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

I can imagine. Looking back I can't figure out what went wrong, it's obviously, as you say, a better version. My bad!  Felis Leo Talk! 21:08, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello FelisLeo, Apologies, I forgot I wasn’t in the Sandbox anymore and did not leave an explanation of edits. I removed names in response to the flag “This article may require copy editing for excessive namedropping”. (Arteamus (talk) 03:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC))

No worries :)  Felis Leo Talk! 08:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Edits by 108.36.112.4
This address belongs to an Elementary School and I am a member of the IT staff. I am writing you this message to request a block on editing from this IP address to prevent our students from making non-constructive edits such as the one you reverted. Thank You. 108.36.112.4 (talk) 12:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

In order confirm this request is really made by school staff I suggest you use the [Contact Page] and contact the Wikipedia staff directly in order to get your shared IP blocked indefinately.-- Felis Leo Talk! 18:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your edits to Boss Nigger
Hi. Thank you for refreshing a dead URL at Boss Nigger. You also removed a second footnote that included a dead URL.

Instead of deleting the footnote like you did, you could have tagged it with the dead link template. Alternatively, you could read the guidance at WP:DEADREF regarding "preventing and repairing dead links".

I fixed the link at Boss Nigger (and a related one you deleted at William Smith (actor)), but I was just informing you for future reference. Thanks again. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! I wasn't aware there is policy concerning link removal upon link death, good reading though an probably a subject I will look into more.  Felis Leo Talk! 13:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Igloo
Hi, you need to be more careful using Igloo, which is still in alpha test. It is not conducive to a happy working environment here for you to be reverting the transformation of a redirect into a disambiguation page, and to be templating the regulars. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 13:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Fine, I will stop using Igloo. It was my first test run after using a lot of TW and Huggle and I checked my steps but couldn't find any damage done on my part at the time. Thanks for the heads-up though, although I would have preferred a lighter note.    Felis  Leo Talk! 13:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay. Sorry about the tone, it was influenced by this. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 17:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FC Goa Fan (talk • contribs) 19:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajith_Nair- This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.
How can I maintain this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brayden Gregg (talk • contribs) 09:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Deprodding of LPS Grade 6 Maths Game
I have removed the prod tag from LPS Grade 6 Maths Game, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-proded, even by the article creator. I have listed the article at Articles for deletion/LPS Grade 6 Maths Game; if you still think the article should be deleted, feel free to comment there. Thanks! עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * At 14:06, 29 August 2016 LPS Grade 6 Maths Game was deleted by User:Patar knight. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:43, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2006-2008 Southeastern U.S drought, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page D4. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Kianoush Rostami
Removed petty internet ethno-nationalism; he represents Iran, has an Iranian passport and was born there, regardless of his ethnicity. There are Kurdish sepatarists active on wikipedia actively trying to devide different ethnicities living in Iran. By removing the ethno-nationalistic sentiments you will get a more objective article. Please focus on the user 'Tehsojiro'. I edited my comment a few weeks afo. I'm not going to spam my comment with every change make in the main article. Parrax (talk) 12:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

And why can't his ethnicity be mentioned? it is mentioned with other athletes. But it is a problem because he is Kurdish and it doesn't fit with what Iranian supremacists/racists think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tehsojiro (talk • contribs) 11:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Honestly, I don't know. But edit warring is not the way to resolve this. Why don't you guys start a civil discussion on the matter on the article's Talk page?  ron az Talk!  11:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Did so and there is no 'civil discussion' whatsoever. Iranian nationalists are not interested in ever admitting there is even a thing as a Kurdish ethnicity. And what now? We just leave the article at the current state just because they happened to have the last edit before moderators stepped in? Tehsojiro (talk) 08:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Civil discussion does not appear out of the blue, if nobody finds the issue interesting enough to discuss it at the talk page you might want to do a WP:RFC.  ron az Talk!  19:02, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Don't edit my talk page
If I remove something from my talk page, that is my decision. It is not up to you to decide that I shouldn't have done so. Don't do that again. 94.117.95.202 (talk) 09:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Well good morning to you too! Must me a mistake on my end. I don't make a habit of editing other people's talk pages. Thanks for the very friendly heads up. 09:31, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I am glad that it was a mistake and not just someone childishly trolling. I have experienced the latter many, many times, and I don't think I have ever seen the former before.  94.117.95.202 (talk) 09:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 06:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks! :)  ron az Talk!  07:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Re: Media Fuse Dentsu Aegis Network
Hi Ronaz, I noticed you earmarked my article with the above title for speedy deletion. It has previously been earmarked but after i moderated it was restored. i would like you to hint possible areas in which i might have erred so that i might re edit it Thanks JJ kelvin (talk) 18:40, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello, I will reply to your emails and this question here on my talk page. The article was nominated and deleted under the G11 criteria for Speedy Deletion. This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. Promotion does not necessarily mean commercial promotion: anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. You also seem to have a close relation to the subject. This can also become a Conflict of interest. The best course of action would be to list the subject at Articles for Creation.  ron az Talk!  07:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

The Bed Sitting Room (film)
Hi Ronaz, in response to your reverting my correction of the dialogue in the move "The Bed Sitting Room"...

this is a British film with British English dialogue, and the dialogue clearly and repeatedly refers to the character's "inside leg measurements" rather than "inseam measurements". Perhaps there's a dubbed version which you have seen and which uses this Americanism but "inseam" is meaningless on this side of the Atlantic, whereas "inside leg" is a well-known innuendo which appears in countless British television shows and movies of the period. Rather than revert my edit, you could add a bracketed explanation of the meaning of the phrase for Americans, or remove the quotation marks.

82.11.72.220 (talk) 10:19, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


 * I wasn't contesting whether it should be inseam or inside leg, I reverted because you didn't add a source that supports your claim. On top of that, I used the wrong template, sorry about that. Lastly, I am on the same side of the Atlantic as you are :)  ron az Talk!  20:16, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry Ronaz I didn't have a source, I just know that film very well, which is not very encyclopedic! I really am surprised that Brits use the expression "inseam", I've heard it in America, but never in the UK, and I'm not clear whether it carries the same double-entendre in the USA as it does over her. 82.11.72.220 (talk) 20:35, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Kianoush Rostami - new vandalism
It appears that once again we are going into an edit war. It is at this point clear that user Parrax will remove any and all attempts to highlight the athlete's ethnicity. I made multiple reports through wikipedia's obtuse system and have heard nothing back. Don't know what to do but I won't stand for our ethnicity being denied time and time again. Tehsojiro (talk) 20:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Dear Ronaz, I really don't understand what is going on with the Kianoush Rostami page. First it was put under protection while the information about his ethnicity was there, and then it was removed by user Parrax and suddenly the page gets protected again but this time we can't correct it with the information on his ethnicity?? What is going on? Tehsojiro (talk) 14:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Jon Stoll Wiki Page Deletion
Ronaz,

Jon was a very notable figure in the world of concert production and promotion. Anyone in the industry knew and continues to know of Jon from his legendary stamp on establishing the concert world on the east coast (most specifically the Southeast and Florida) and concerts wouldn't be what they are today without Fantasma Production's imprint and/or Jon Stoll's independent drive, spirit and ambition throughout the years. Aside to being a forerunner in a largely outlaw dog eat dog industry from the early 70s until the mid 2000s, Jon was one of the biggest if not the biggest independent concert promoters in the United States fighting against the "soon to be" corporate sharks who are now Live Nation - Jon came before Live Nation (which was formerly SFX and before than Celler Door) so he was a pioneer in what is today known as one of the most lucrative and explosive industries in the world, concert promotion and production. With that said, every fact stated in the article is 100% true and if I need to dig up references to back them up, I am happy to.

Feel free to contact me directly to discuss further but I strongly urge to keep this Wikipedia page up and active in honor of one of the greatest pioneers in both the concert world and independent showmanship.

Jess64888 (talk) 14:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Jesse


 * I understand your views on the subject of this article. I listed it at AfD with my reasoning on why it should be deleted. Let's have the AfD discussion run its course. It is a community tool where consensus is needed in order to delete an article. Although I understand the sentiment leaving a page up in someone's honor is never a good argument for inclusion. Feel free to add the references, the article has been tagged sinds 2010 to improve said references but the maintenance tag was removed without discussion and is buried in the page history. ron az Talk!  11:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * After some consideration I decided to withdraw its nomination. I found out there's a book and regular magazines mentioning Jon Stoll. I did tag the article with tags on what area the article needs improvement.  ron az Talk!  13:46, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.

You are encouraged to change
 * →  ron az Talk! 

to
 * →  ron az Talk!

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 03:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for taking care of this! (It's usually best to reply on the same talk page.) —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:42, 29 November 2017 (UTC)