User talk:Roncemer

Welcome!

Hello, Roncemer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jax Framework, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 00:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Jax Framework


The article Jax Framework has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No third party reliable sources to show notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 00:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Deletion
Sorry you feel like that. I'm assuming the anonymous comment on the talk page was you. However, I'm afraid that Wikipedia is not here for new projects, unless they can be shown to have a lot of coverage in reliable independent sources. The article was only linked to a download site, which may establish existence but nothing more in terms of notability. It could also be regarded as advertising - yes, that applies to free stuff too. Please look at WP:GNG and WP:RS. Another point is that here things change. If you put up a profile at AboutUs, it will be the same six months hence (unless you have edited it). Here, things get edited by anyone. (Quite a lot of which gets reverted within minutes by our patrollers...). If you put up an article, and value it, it pays to keep an eye on it. This one had a proposed deletion notice on it for a week. You could have challenged in that time, or addressed the problems that made someone decide it wasn't up to our requirements. Remember that this is an encyclopaedia, not a channel for bringing your thing to the notice of the public, be it open source software, the surest way to heaven, or the Museum of the History of Downby Duck Pond. Any queries, please contact me at my talk page. Peridon (talk) 18:25, 20 October 2011 (UTC)