User talk:Ronensdeor

January 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Reduxio Systems has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:39, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Reduxio Systems was changed by Ronensdeor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93921 on 2020-01-14T14:39:48+00:00

Hey, I removed your CSD tag as a company switching their focuse is not a valid reason to delete a page. Please see WP:CSD for the valid reasons dor CSD.  LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 14:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Ronensdeor, tagging the Reduxio Systems article for speedy deletion because of major company efforts or changes is not the proper way of improving the article or updating its content. Speedy deletions are only used for specific situations that are listed on the policy page where having the article deleted without discussion is necessary, and when such an article meets that specific criterion. The act of a company rolling out major restructuring efforts or changes is not one of those situations. Instead, the content should be included in the article in the appropriate section. I often suggest to users who are having issues with adding major changes to an article like this to consider updating the content to reflect a historical aspect of the article subject and its timeline. In your case, if major decisions were rolled out that fundamentally change the company down to its core and in a way that transforms it completely, you could consider having the current content reflect the company in the past, then add the new content and changes to reflect the company as it is currently. Just keep in mind that due and undue weight should be considered when deciding whether or not this change is appropriate. Please take the necessary time to review and understand Wikipedia's speedy deletion policy before tagging another article or page for deletion again. It's disruptive to repeatedly tag an article for deletion after being notified (as you were above) and asked to stop; repeated disruptive behavior can result in being blocked from editing Wikipedia, even if your intentions were not malicious. Please keep this in mind, and please don't hesitate to let me know if you have any questions. Thanks :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)