User talk:Ronherry/Archives/2021/December

All Too Well
Hello, I want to discuss about the Don McLean bit in the article. It was covered by the popular press, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia above all. I do not see how that quote specifically contributes to the song's significance. I can include praises for Swift from Stevie Nicks or Dolly Parton in the Taylor Swift article because they were all covered in the press, but that alone is not enough for inclusion. Ippantekina (talk) 13:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Encyclopedia of facts is what Wikipedia is. Erasing a widely convered event related to the article's subject from the article as if it never happened is disruptive as well. Dolly and Nicks' praise is not relevant to Swift's article because it holds no context. That's a poor anology right there. Don acknowledging Swift is relevant because he said it directly after her song broke his record. It's not a mere token of appreciation. It's about how an artist A responded to his decades-old record being broke by artist B. Ronherry (talk) 16:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Records being broken are a natural thing. I still don't understand how it will specifically enhance the article. Ippantekina (talk) 08:27, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Only the Young (Taylor Swift song)
The article Only the Young (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Only the Young (Taylor Swift song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of My Tears Ricochet for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Tears Ricochet, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/My Tears Ricochet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Cowboy like Me for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cowboy like Me, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Cowboy like Me until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Request
70svinyl accidentally removed sourced genre (Stereogum), can you restore? Plus, "Melted Stone" is a copyright holder for her recordings, not a label. 183.171.114.114 (talk) 12:51, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Only the Young (Taylor Swift song)
The article Only the Young (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Only the Young (Taylor Swift song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * Thank you. I appreciate it Ronherry (talk) 12:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taylor Swift, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moral superiority.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Only the Young (Taylor Swift song)
Any updates on this GAN, as it's been a week since I left my last comments? --K. Peake 08:57, 22 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry. I apologize. It's been a busy week. I've been making small edits on Wikipedia, but it's been hard for me to get into that GA nomination right now. I'll look into it now. I'll try to finish it. If I don't finish it today (in 24 hours), then do what you should do as a reviewer. Thanks. Regards. Ronherry (talk) 11:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Only the Young (Taylor Swift song)
The article Only the Young (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Only the Young (Taylor Swift song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Katy Perry. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Calidum  18:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.