User talk:Ronherry/Archives/2022/December

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Ronherry. Thank you for your work on 2022 Ticketmaster controversy. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   19:49, 30 November 2022 (UTC)


 * You're welcome!  ℛonherry  ☘  05:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Since it seems like you have kept your grudge for this long, then go and take it to ANI.

You seem to resort to threats when there's always an editing dispute, and I have no problem having both our behaviors examined. It seems that every time I even edit an article, you escalate it into personal attacks and threats. PHShanghai &#124; they/them (talk) 18:06, 2 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm not going to respond to all the out-of-topic things you're bringing up. I really do not care about you. So, please stick to the subject, shall we? Do not continue to make disruptive edits. All I told you was to stop making disruptive or face the consequences, that's not me saying it, that's the Wikipedia policy. That's all. Now please move on. Regards.  ℛonherry  ☘  18:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
I giving the two of you the same warning terms, for the record:


 * 1) If you make any more unconstructive comments towards other editors, your account will be blocked. (You've been better about keeping it on topic, but still, just comment on content rather that accusations of bias, for example.)
 * 2) If you do any more reverting on the current disputes, or WP:BRD violations on new disputes, you're going to be blocked or WP:PBLOCKed.

All you need to do is keep to concise, constructive debate at the various disputes at hand. Comment on content, not editors, and stay on topic. If you're at a stand-still, either wait for other editors to weigh in, or neutrally notify places like WP:WIKIPROJECTs for extra input. Sergecross73  msg me  18:24, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 3
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * 2022 Ticketmaster controversy
 * added a link pointing to Fortune
 * Midnights
 * added a link pointing to Cassette

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Try to stay neutral
It's one thing to oppose Ticketmaster in this ordeal, but you know better than to insert bias like this where you obviously are trying to call the company evil. We cannot make edits that reflect our own opinions on subjects whether we like or dislike them. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:57, 11 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I am neutral. Several sources have called it Ticketmaster a evil, deceptive company, so I thought it would be interesting to link that article up in See Also. Moreover, it's See Also, not the article body. And it's a pop culture trope, not a fact. "Evil corporation" is a "a trope in popular culture that *portrays* a corporation as ignoring social responsibility, morality, ethics, and sometimes laws in order to make profit for its shareholders." Portrayal is not necessarily a fact. But if another editor finds its inclusion in See Also as "biased", then they can remove it, I wouldn't oppose. I wasn't "trying to call the company evil". I saw it in some of the sources, so I included it. Try to assume good faith. Regards.  ℛonherry  ☘  04:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)


 * You would've been better off including quotes from articles criticizing it as an evil corporation instead. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 13:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Misleading edit summaries
I see you have used the edit summary "c/e" many times. The edit summary means "copyedit", but a great many of your edits labeled this way are expansions of the article, not copyediting. Check out Edit summary legend; you might try summarizing with "expand". Binksternet (talk) 08:41, 18 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Okay.  ℛonherry  ☘  09:13, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * But the thing is I did both. I copyedited, while adding some new parts.  ℛonherry  ☘  09:14, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

DYK for 2022 Ticketmaster controversy
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of All Too Well: The Short Film
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article All Too Well: The Short Film you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Mike Christie, on behalf of Nineteen Ninety-Four guy -- Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 22:29, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of All Too Well: The Short Film
The article All Too Well: The Short Film you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:All Too Well: The Short Film and Talk:All Too Well: The Short Film/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nineteen Ninety-Four guy -- Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 08:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of All Too Well: The Short Film
The article All Too Well: The Short Film you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:All Too Well: The Short Film for comments about the article, and Talk:All Too Well: The Short Film/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nineteen Ninety-Four guy -- Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 07:03, 23 December 2022 (UTC)