User talk:Ronherry/Archives/2022/October

Images of Taylor Swift
...are not needed in every article. Olivia Rodrigo's image is more relevant in an article where she is mentioned in practically every sentence. The comparisons made here were to the song, "Cruel Summer", not Taylor Swift's looks. By your logic, the image you are inserting is decorative as well. Yes, images where an artist is performing the song are preferred, but a non-performance image of the same person is the best alternative in case of the absence of one, obviously. This behaviour on a recent featured article is provocative and will lead to consequences if continued. Regards.--NØ 13:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I will reiterate, just so it is clear, do not do this again. Given the timing, I will be taking this very seriously and raise it at whatever noticeboard I have to. Regards.--NØ 14:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * "Do not do this again". Can you define "this"? Because to me, it looks like I was bold to replace an image. I am within my rights to change an image in an article I find inappropriate. Please not threaten me. You do not own the article. You, on the other had, are constantly reverting the article to your version, refusing to collaborate. Let me remind you, you reverted my edit twice. I did not violate any rule in this matter. Go to any noticeboard you want to. Regards.  ℛonherry  ☘  17:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * And you're factually wrong. The song was not only "compared" to Swift, Swift is a credited songwriter because Rodrigo's song samples Swift's song. Including an image of the sampled artist in the song's article is a very common practice; please do not pretend like it is not. Thanks.  ℛonherry  ☘  17:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, slay. Cruel Summer is a bop and Queen Swift sounded great in the sample. However, I have explained to you the importance of having an image of Rodrigo in the article to go with the blurb. No, it does not need to necessarily be one of her performing. I hope this is clear now. To be clear, I am not threatening you unless you continue to pursue edits that make the article unstable. I like some of the other work you are doing and do not want to intentionally get you in trouble. Regards.--NØ 17:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sour (album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sour (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MaranoFan -- MaranoFan (talk) 18:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions
The article Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SL93 -- SL93 (talk) 04:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The GA bot didn't update the article. I started a discussion on the GA talk page for help. SL93 (talk) 17:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh! I wonder why it didn't update.  ℛonherry  ☘  17:27, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I added it myself. The bot did everything it was supposed to do, except place the icon and notify you. SL93 (talk) 21:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Midnights, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Economic Times.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK
Heya, Can you please take a look at Template:Did you know nominations/Bejeweled (song) as a major contributor -- Guerillero  Parlez Moi 14:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sour (album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sour (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 22:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

re: High Watch vs. Holiday House
Hello. I noticed that you had changed the name to High Watch which was only used during the ownership of the Wattles family in the 1980s. It was built as Holiday House and has been called that since Taylor Swift purchased it. It is also most commonly known in the public as Holiday House. Mst7070 (talk) 01:06, 30 October 2022 (UTC)


 * And your source is?  ℛonherry  ☘  08:53, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Well if you must know, it was a family house that was built by my great grandmother, Pearl Snowden. The entire family vacationed there at what was always and only called "Holiday House" until they sold it in 1948. It is referenced in the book that I cited previously on this page - Watch Hill Through Time. The Wattles renamed it High Watch in the 1980s until it was sold in 1996. It doesn't seem like much transpired in the intervening years but once Taylor Swift purchased it, she reverted to calling it Holiday House. She also refers to it as such in her song, The Last Great American Dynasty. Any articles you might see referring to it as High Watch are erroneously referring to the name used only in the 1980s. Thank you. Mst7070 (talk) 19:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I wish I could help you but this is a conflict on interest on your part. Wikipedia values published sources more than anything.  ℛonherry  ☘  19:43, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, I understand you wanting the house to remain with the name your great grandmother gave it, but law simply does not work that way. Once officially renamed, the name simply does not revert back once the owner died. The name stays until someone else (like Swift) had filed the house under that name during her purchase or when she plans to sell it. In US official documents, the property will often be described as "a deed of trust dated such-and-such and recorded as instrument no. ##### given by (name) on property". The last purchase must have described the house as High Watch, and that's the only reason why media continues to refer to the house as High Watch. We do not have access to the actual document to confirm this, and hence Wikipedia sticks to available & reliable sources than hearsay or individuals. Sorry.  ℛonherry  ☘  19:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)