User talk:Ronknight

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Ronknight! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created  is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Ron Knight -

Proposed deletion of Knight Mediacom International


The article Knight Mediacom International has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Lacking reliable sources with a sufficient depth of coverage to establish notability of a company.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. tedder (talk) 02:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ron Knight


The article Ron Knight has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Lacking reliable sources with a sufficient depth of coverage to establish notability of an individual. One paragraph in nytimes, IMDB profile isn't promising.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. tedder (talk) 02:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is I just received a legal threat over a deletion - a pointless one, but a legal threat nonetheless. Thank you.SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:55, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Indefinitely blocked
Due to your explicit legal threat made to another editor, I have blocked you indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. This means, while the legal threat stands, or while legal proceedings are taking place, per our policy on legal threats, you are not allowed to edit Wikipedia in the meantime.

If you would like to be unblocked, you must retract your legal threats and/or proceedings. You may do so by adding the text and replacing "Your reason here" with said retraction. Please make sure you are also familiar with our guide to appealing blocks, as future misunderstanding will cause reviewing administrators in later requests to look down even less favorably on future unblock requests.

If you feel more comfortable addressing the issue via email, then you may email  and request a review of your block in that manner. Regards, –MuZemike 06:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC)