User talk:Ronruser

 Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ronruser! My name is Jonathunder. I just wanted to say howdy and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or press the "Request Help" button at the bottom of this message. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or press the "Request Help" button below. Again, welcome!

Parliamentary Procedure WikiProject
Thank you for the work you have been doing on the Robert's Rules article. Wikipedia has a Parliamentary Procedure Project which may be of interest to you. Cheers. Jonathunder (talk) 16:36, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I took your suggestion and ran with it... Thanks! Ronruser (talk) 03:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Re List of books with Robert's Rules in the title
Hi. On the assumption that you're still working on this, it might be worthwhile putting a on it so that it doesn't get flagged by a reviewer. Cheers, Hydronium Hydroxide (talk) 16:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Majority, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simple majority. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Use of templates
Hello and welcome. Regarding this edit, the convention is to omit the " " when using article-space templates. Thus, not  . See Help:Template. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 07:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Meeting (parliamentary procedure)


The article Meeting (parliamentary procedure) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This seems to be original research - items from Roberts Rules are presented as if they apply to all parliaments, without any evidence to justify this implicit claim. It needs to be properly sourced and also carefully qualified. Or deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andyjsmith (talk) 17:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Merging
There's a clear process for merging articles, explained at WP:MERGE. I'd be grateful if you would follow it, including tagging the pages so other people know what you propose, informing significant contributors, and waiting 30 days to see if anyone objects. Andyjsmith (talk) 17:49, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Understood. I thought these merges were obvious and uncontroversial. I'll hold off doing any more for now. Ronruser (talk) 17:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

March 2018
Your recent editing history at Robert's Rules of Order shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:38, 10 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the message and thanks for helping get the page temporarily locked. Hopefully I can get this issue resolved with this editor. Ronruser (talk) 23:42, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Notification of Dispute Resolution Notice
I have opened a review of our Robert's Rules issues at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Robert's_Rules_of_Order. Please kindly review and provide your perspective. Sakuranohi (talk) 21:07, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Sakuranohi

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!)Sakuranohi (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I have added my summary. Hopefully we can get this issue resolved. Ronruser (talk) 01:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)