User talk:Roogroog

Philip K. Dick
I've removed the paragraphs of narrative you added to the Bibliography of Philip K. Dick, not because I had objections to the content, but becuase there is a full article on Philip K. Dick already. The Bibliography is basically a list that was split off from the main article because of its length, and doesn't need that long a narrative to introduce it. Perhaps you might want to boil it down to a short paragraph, or add some of your material to the main article? Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz)  (talk / cont)  17:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. Another editor restored your introduction, but I still think it would be best if it was parred down to about a paragraph, and other stuff ported over the to main article.  Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz)  (talk / cont)  02:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, you "think it would be best" but in fact, the material Roogroog wrote was far superior to anything you have added, and provides a concise overview of PKD's oeuvre. In other words, it is perfect. Furthermore, Ed, your good friend has just accused Roogroog of plagiarism.  Way to assume bad faith there, bud. Viriditas (talk) 07:38, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The article reads like it was lifted from somewhere. That's an observation, not an accusation. In any case, it is replete with unsourced opinions and has no business being in any article in its current format. P.S. Do you enjoy talking to yourself? Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 10:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You're implying plagiarism. I have no idea what you mean by "do you enjoy talking to yourself", but if you are implying sock puppetry, I suggest you file a check user request.  Furthermore, you have assumed bad faith with both a newbie and a long-term editor.  I suggest you write out a detailed apology to both, as your bad faith accusations have no merit.  Please learn to treat your fellow editors with respect and do not persist in making wild, baseless accusations without evidence. Viriditas (talk) 09:02, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You lack both an understanding of what I'm saying, and a sense of humor. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 14:06, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * What part of "respect" do you not understand? There is nothing funny about making false accusations against new and long-term editors.  Please do yourself a favor and try to understand Civility before someone files a report against you. Viriditas (talk) 08:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)