User talk:RookZERO/Archive

Dear Rookzero

Mehrgahr does not meet the criteria of civilisation established in this article. It has no script and is a neolithic culture. If you include this under the article on civilisation, we will have to include every neolithic culture of the planet. It does not belong here. John D. Croft 03:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Regarding WP:AN3RR
Friend,

Regarding
 * Diff 1, :Diff 2, :Diff 3,

Note that it does not always take 4 reverts to block an editor. I have closed the 3RR request here as no action, please be careful in the future. I encourage discussion on the article talk page, and steps listed in dispute resolution are useful also. Regards, Navou banter 12:55, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

You really need to knock off your editing tactics
There was no reason to revert my edits at David Miscavige. My edits were well researched and entirely proper. The lermanet reference actually changes the name of the article, thus disqualifying it as a reliable source. The holysmoke.org reference is the same article with the proper headline. And if you read the article, you'll see my edit reflects exactly what the article says.HubcapD 18:40, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, holysmoke.org is a major no-no as a source. It's one of the worst, most amateurish angry crank homemade pages out there. Even Lerma's site would be better than holysmoke! But they're both unacceptable as reliable sources, even for courtesy links. wikipediatrix 19:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, someone else told me that I didn't need to link to them either, since the article itself is the source. Hence, I have removed the link from the reference.HubcapD 19:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

This is the third time you've reverted my edit on David Miscavige!!! It's not in a 24 hour period, so 3RR isn't in effect yet, but if you keep it up, I'll have no choice but to report you! If you have a problem with my edit, talk to me about it first!HubcapD 18:09, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

WP:PUNC
Please see WP:PUNC
 * Punctuation marks are placed inside the quote marks only if the sense of the punctuation is part of the quotation (this system is referred to as logical quotation).

--Philip Baird Shearer 10:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

3RR violation on David Miscavige
I'm sick of this! I've reported you. HubcapD 01:17, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

your behavior
If you persist in childish name-calling editors you disagree with as "cult vandals", and in edit-warring with little or no consensus, rationale, or edit summaries, your behavior will have to be addressed on the Administrator's Incidents Noticeboard. The bull-in-a-china-shop approach to editing never wins in the end. wikipediatrix 01:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Update: and now you're saying "for no reason other than that they disagree with the cult's wishes"? You're confused. I'm one of the few editors here who aren't in the cult of Scientology or the cult of anti-Scientology. You've been warned to cease the WP:NPA violations multiple times already. Use the talk pages and communicate like a normal human being. wikipediatrix 01:45, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm adding my voice to this. You're reverted my edit on the Miscavige article despite the fact that my edit says exactly what the source says. Furthermore, you make no attempt to communicate what your disagreement with my edit is, and that's just not okay!HubcapD 05:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)