User talk:Rooley555

Hello, I represent Ebuyer. I have noticed you have made a number of updates to our page which contain false information. We will be removing any incorrect information you have published, please can you stop posting inaccurate content on our page, unless you can provide citation. Thank you.

Hello, I'm DissidentAggressor. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bitcoin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Dissident Aggressor 22:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Please supply a reliable reference for your current statement on the Bitcoin article.
Please supply a reliable reference for your current statement on the Bitcoin article. If you do not supply a reliable, verifiable source within one month, your entire statement can be removed. Do not accept editors deleting your statements and simply calling them vandalism. You have the right to supply a reference. It can only be possibly removed, if you do not supply a reference. MonteDaCunca (talk) 23:22, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pornhub has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pornhub was changed by Rooley555 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952584 on 2014-05-24T22:04:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:04, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=619793811 your edit] to Lisbela e o Prisioneiro may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:59, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Infobox film

August 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lisbela e o Prisioneiro has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lisbela e o Prisioneiro was changed by Rooley555 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954656 on 2014-08-04T10:04:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lisbela e o Prisioneiro with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ~ Frosty  ( Talk page )  10:08, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Justin Bieber. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 10:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 23:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)