User talk:Roomdarkxx1

Alan Davey
Consider this your only warning. Please do not add unsourced information to the Alan Davey article. It goes against our strictly enforced BLP policy. OohBunnies!  (talk)  17:37, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Can you define what a sourced article is please
 * Articles, especially BLPS, should have sourced information, not unverified chit-chat and gossip. See WP:RS. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

the material i am adding is not unsourced chit chat it is fact if i supplied you with the police incident number and the names of the UK police officers who were handling the case would that stop you removing this material
 * No. See the link Drmies gave you for what constitutes a reliable source. OohBunnies!   (talk)  17:47, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

The material iam submitting is based on fact it happended Alan Davey phoned me and informed that it had happened its a matter of public record details which can be obtained from the UK police.
 * That doesn't matter. We aren't a tabloid. All of our information should be sourced to reliable sources. This is policy, and it when it comes to biographies of living persons this policy is doubly strict, for legal reasons. OohBunnies!   (talk)  17:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

I do not accept this.
 * Uh, well, there's nothing you can do. The page has already been protected to stop you from editing it, and if you attempt to add the information again in the future without a source, you will probably be blocked from editing. OohBunnies!   (talk)  17:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * What OohBunnies! said. Our BLP policy is not there for you choose to accept: it's a given. Drmies (talk) 17:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Alan Davey. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 17:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:45, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. OohBunnies!  (talk)  07:59, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:42, 16 July 2012 (UTC)