User talk:Roopraiash

December 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ernest Rutherford, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ernest Rutherford was changed by Roopraiash (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951271 on 2011-12-15T12:10:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:10, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Rutherford and Ash Rooprai Journal


A tag has been placed on The Rutherford and Ash Rooprai Journal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Logan Talk Contributions 12:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 (continued)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at J. J. Thomson, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: J. J. Thomson was changed by Roopraiash (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.977085 on 2011-12-16T09:28:50+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:29, 16 December 2011 (UTC)