User talk:Rooster191

Rabbit or hare
It might be inaccurate but sources, even Chinese ones, tend to use rabbit more than hare so either is going to be right but WP:COMMONNAME applies and the article needs to stick with rabbit. By all means sdd a, sourced, paragraph towards the start explaining the misnomer but don't keep making global changes wuthout consensus that hare should be the used term. If you want to see if their is a consensus then start a discussion on the article talk page. Nthep (talk) 09:46, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

There is a Wikipedia practice called Bold, revert, discuss. You were bold in making changes, I reverted those as explained above, now we need to discuss. Continued reversion without discussion can be considered disruptive editing. If you put forward a policy based, cogent and sourced case as to why the article should use hare rather than rabbit then I'll listen and discuss. If you just continue making find and replace changes which are unexplained and break existing links then I'll take action accordingly. Nthep (talk) 11:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)