User talk:Rorry1

License tagging for Image:Daveheineman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Daveheineman.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:SteveBeshear 190x266.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SteveBeshear 190x266.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Arnold Schwarzenegger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Arnold Schwarzenegger.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:SteveBeshear 190x266.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SteveBeshear 190x266.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tom (talk - email) 02:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Arnold Schwarzenegger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Arnold Schwarzenegger.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tom (talk - email) 02:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Daveheineman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Daveheineman.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tom (talk - email) 02:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Image uploads
Please do not upload images taken from the web, claiming that you created them yourself. This is considered a copyright violation and the images are likely to be deleted. Passportguy (talk) 13:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Easy way to add references
I saw your note on the earthquake page. There's a really easy way to add references. If you click on my preferences, then the gadgets tab, you'll see a check box for refTools. Check that, then when you're editing, you can click a little button at the top of your edit box that says cite. It brings up a nice little form that will create a cite tag for you. --Elliskev 23:19, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Los Angeles earthquake
Hi Rorry1. I just want to say, I am really impressed with your comments at Articles for deletion/2008 Los Angeles earthquake. Keep up the good work, wiki warrior! --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 01:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm impressed as well. Apparently, the admin who kept the article was too, since you were cited as the reason he kept it. Good job; keep up the amazing work! --haha169 (talk) 22:13, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Quake yorba linda.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Quake yorba linda.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:54, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Thought I ought to say...
Hello, Rorry1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! Cliff smith (talk) 22:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

The pic for the quake
Heya. Noted this image you uploaded for the quake from yesterday. I'm originally from Yorba Linda, which store did you shoot this in? (Note, I promise I won't tell the store! I know some don't like to have photos taken of the insides....) -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 23:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Regarding the above image, I've republished it to Wikimedia Commons due to the suggestion tag. All credit has been given to you, of course. --haha169 (talk) 00:17, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Carmel, in.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Carmel, in.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

 * Note from blocking admin. This is a sock of banned user . ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 00:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I dont know how one could come to that conclusion. There is no proof. I was just editing specific pages.Rorry1 (talk) 01:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I read through the list of puppets by this banned user, and you made a serious mistake. First of all, this "banned" user has a list of IP addresses that begin with 69, 75, and 76. My IP begins with 98.Rorry1 (talk) 01:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm so pissed off right now, its not even funny. I did NOTHING wrong, and everything I have done in my months of being here has been erased, my main page is marked with this tag that is totally false, this is just making me physically ill to see what you people are doing. I haven't done anything, and you people have given me NOTHING to work with here. You just tell me "well, we dont have the ability to check your IP's, so instead of dealing with that, we just assume you guily." What kind of crap is that? Rorry1 (talk) 02:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I think the admin that blocked me may be mad because I deleted an unsourced entry that he insisted be in the article at El Segundo, California. See here . I deleted this entry that had no sources to it (as good editors should), and he has proceeded to reinsert the invalid information twice. Because I defied him, I think it made him mad. Rorry1 (talk) 04:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anaheim Hills Elementary School


The article Anaheim Hills Elementary School has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no claim of notability is present in article; high schools are considered to be inherently notable, but lower level schools than that are not inherently notable by current consensus.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin (talk) 22:33, 7 May 2011 (UTC)