User talk:Rosaita8

Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you.

Speedy deletion nomination of Aline Borough


A tag has been placed on Aline Borough, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This is a hoax, the author is creating some blogs about this "author", there is no more information

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. UAwiki (talk) 12:07, 11 July 2013 (UTC)


 * I have deleted your article, because searches find no trace in any reliable source of Aline Borough or Blue Stone. One of Wikipedia's fundamental policies is Verifiability: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source." If Aline Borough existed at all, she evidently did not meet Wikipedia's WP:Notability criterion, which requires evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 13:03, 11 July 2013 (UTC)