User talk:Rosannedavis

Speedy deletion nomination of Bali Animal Welfare Association


A tag has been placed on Bali Animal Welfare Association, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  DGG ( talk ) 03:53, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. I deleted your article because  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  13:24, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you gave two references, it is clear that neither remotely meets the standard of an independent third-party source, both are affiliated with BAWA
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact but with no independent verification include: relieves the suffering of animals... for sustainable improvement to animal welfare now and into the future... genetically unique street dog... that is under threat... that check in for love and attention to prepare them for a better life... BAWA operates its emergency response Hotline around the clock... receives around 40 calls every day and rescues and treats more than 1000 animals in distress every year...  with suitable humans in loving homes...—and so on, it's just a promotional leaflet
 * it's all about what BAWA allegedly does, little about the organisation company. How many employees? volunteers? How is it funded? What is it's  total income?