User talk:Rosant

HEY ROSANT
Are you interested in helping me out with Dominican topics...Hey look i been searching for people interested in D.R for millions of years!!lol...i need help in some cities...well i build up Santo Domingo but i want to develop other Articles!do you want to help??EdwinCasadoBaez 06:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:JVeneno.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JVeneno.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 16:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

RE
Hi, there! Thanks for assuming good faith (on my part)! Just as a suggestion, you may want to place this template on the top of the article that you are creating to keep the wiki-wolves (like me) at bay until it satisfies WP:N. If you need anything from me, feel free to give me a shout on my talkpage! Cheers!--Sallicio$\color{Red} \oplus$ 02:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Rosant! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Robin Santana -
 * 2) Salvador Gomez -
 * 3) Rolando Paulino -
 * 4) Rafael Villanueva -
 * 5) Rafael Molina Morillo -
 * 6) Epy Guerrero -
 * 7) Neftalí Cruz -

Proposed deletion of Glovis Reyes Aglon


The article Glovis Reyes Aglon has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Empty Buffer (talk) 07:13, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Robin Santana for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Robin Santana, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Robin Santana until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 16:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Neftalí Cruz for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Neftalí Cruz, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Neftalí Cruz until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Los Bolos


The article Los Bolos has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for references found no published (gBooks) in English supporting the content of this article. It has been tagged to add references since October 2006. Without references and unable to find support the article fails WP:V, if WP:RS are added to support the content it would seem to pass WP:N but without references (any language is fine), and no cross language wiki links; it can not be shown to pass WP:N or WP:V.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:51, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Los Colús


The article Los Colús has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for the primary word combination in this article in any language, fails WP:V.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:56, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Salvador_Gomez.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Salvador_Gomez.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Salvador Gómez (politician)


The article Salvador Gómez (politician) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Apparently non-notable mayor of a town of about 12,000, this gentleman is unlikely to meet WP:POLITICAN. As for WP:GNG: I can find a couple passing references to this putative politician, I think, but nothing that verifies he's a mayor, and nothing that provides anything more than passing coverage. Additional sources, as always, welcomed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe deckertalk to me 05:08, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Betty Jane Belanus for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Betty Jane Belanus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Betty Jane Belanus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 21:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Rafael Villanueva for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rafael Villanueva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rafael Villanueva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. DirtyHarry991 (talk) 03:47, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of El Maniel


The article El Maniel has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Dictionary entry and unencyclopedic."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Natg 19 (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)