User talk:RoseDMI

Hello RoseDMI. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Dairy Management Inc. ‎, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * 1) Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * 2) Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * 3) Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * 4) Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.  Will Beback   talk    21:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)


 * PS: I've reverted your wholesale re-write of the DMI article. The short article there seems to have been relatively neutral, while the material you added seems to have been taken from the DMI website with little change. Rather than deleting the existing material, it's better to include additional material. Secondary sources, like newspapers and magazines, are to be preferred over primary sources like the DMI website, which should be used sparingly. Also, please don't delete material from the article's talk page. That's also a good place to discuss your proposed edits, per the instructions above.   Will Beback    talk    21:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Dear Rose

 * I understand your interest in the Dairy Management Inc. article and I have followed your comments on the that article's talk page. You have asked that the article be changed to clarify the nature of the organization. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia anyone can edit. You, me, them, anybody. You can make the changes to the article yourself.(Click on the 'edit' button and your words are automatically in the article.


 * But of course this works both ways. If you change it, I (or anyone else) may change it back. We have to reach some sort of consensus or we descend into endless bickering.


 * So, welcome to Wikipedia. Please make whatever edits you like to any article you like and the community will return the favor by doing the same. I hope you enjoy your time here. If I can be of any help, please click on my name below and leave me a message. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 19:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Question
Are these statements correct:

Dairy Management was incorporated in 1995 as a nonprofit corporation by members of the National Dairy Promotion and Research Board and United Dairy Industry Association. It is funded by a checkoff program administered by the National Dairy Promotion and Research Board.

I must confess that I am quite confused regarding the nature of the association between the government of the United States and Dairy Management. User:Fred Bauder Talk 19:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Response to Fred Bauder
Fred— I would be glad to help clear the confusion in regards to the nature of the association between the government and Dairy Management Inc. Here’s the info:

When confronted with this exact question, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California said: ''“DMI does not constitute or act as a government agency. Rather, it is more like a government contractor, providing staff support to the National Dairy Board (NDB) under an annual contract.”''[CITE 1] So, although some of its work is subject to government oversight, DMI is not part of the government, it’s a private corporation.

Here’s another entry from a 1997 administrative law decision:

“Oversight of NDB is provided by the Secretary [of Agriculture] as required by the [Dairy Production Stabilization] Act, and though DMI is in no sense a "Government Corporation," being instead a private not-for-profit corporation that performs tasks that could be performed by an outside contractor for UDIA and NDB."[CITE 2]

Specifically, DMI is a private, not-for-profit District of Columbia corporation.[CITE 1] and provides the following services to NDB:

•	Administrative staff support for implementing assessment collection procedures, documenting the collection of assessments, and implementing a compliance program approved by NDB;

•	Financial management and accounting services; and

•	Development of programs and strategies and managing the implementation of programs approved by NDB.[CITE 2]

DMI performs similar services for the United Dairy Industry Association (UDIA), another private entity.[CITE 1] and DMI employees are not government employees.[CITE 1]

Fred, thanks for the ongoing dialog.

RoseDMI (talk) 15:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

[CITE 1] ANN M. VENEMAN, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE SECRETARY OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE AND ON BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA MILK PRODUCERS ADVISORY BOARD, AND FRANK HILARIDES, A CALIFORNIA DAIRY FARMER v. DAN GLICKMAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, No. CIV-S-97-0973 DFL PAN. (D.C. Ed. Cal. 1998), available at http://www.dm.usda.gov/oaljdecisions/vol60/Vol60_at_382.htm.

[CITE 2] In re: ANN M. VENEMAN, SECRETARY OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, AND THE CALIFORNIA MILK PRODUCERS ADVISORY BOARD, AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, AND FRANK HILARIDES, A CALIFORNIA DAIRY FARMER., 56 Agric. Dec. 629, 656 (USDA 1997)