User talk:RoseGirlXS

May 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Reverend Lovejoy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Reverend Lovejoy was changed by RoseGirlXS (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894004 on 2014-05-27T20:34:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, RoseGirlXS. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! FourViolas (talk) 02:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Please mind your style
Please review WP:TONE. You have been adding parentheticals and contractions to articles. Generally these are not encyclopedic in style and should be avoided. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 13:53, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Rose, you are still doing this on Family Guy episode articles. Please don't. Davejohnsan (talk) 14:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I am still finding edits you have made that have contractions. Please stop. Davejohnsan (talk) 18:49, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I am still finding edits that you have made in which you added contractions. This has to stop. Davejohnsan (talk) 14:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brian the Bachelor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Starlet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm Doniago. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent edits to the Mars University plot summary because they added a significant amount of unneeded detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 14:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ''You have been warned multiple times to avoid the use of contractions as discussed at WP:TONE. I can only assume that you are continuing to do so intentionally. Please stop.'' DonIago (talk) 13:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Just reverted two edits you made today in which you added contractions. You've been warned countless times by numerous editors that this is not allowed. This is disruptive editing and can result in your account being blocked if you don't stop immediately. Davejohnsan (talk) 22:21, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Contractions
Please stop adding inappropriate contractions to articles as you did here. Consider this your final warning. If an editor reports to me that you have yet again added improper contractions, I will interrupt your editing privileges. Articles must be written in professional tone, and that means we don't use casual speech. Additionally, I removed the content you added because it is based on your personal interpretation. We're not interested in your inferences about the series. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Just reverted an edit today where RoseGirl inserted contractions. Davejohnsan (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Hey
I'm Mpumi02. If you can't pronounce it, call me Mj224. Are you into fashion? Because I LOVE fashion. But I'm not a big-of-a-much cartoon fan, but I do like comedy. Speaking of fashion, do you enjoy exploring dresses, clothes and celeb red-carpet wear. Bye Mpumi02 (talk) 20:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeated submission of improper contractions into articles contrary to MOS:CONTRACTION, as you did at Mom's the Word. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:49, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=689739668 your edit] to Clue (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * of his cover, because his final line of the movie is, "I'm gonna go home and sleep with my wife, ." {{Cite web|url=http://www.cluedofan.com/movie/movie.htm |title=Clue - The

Deliberately disruptive?
Hi, are you being deliberately disruptive? Your account was blocked in September because you kept making problematic edits that are contrary to WP:TONE yet as I look through your edits since then, you still seem to be going out of your way to introduce contractions like here, where you also inexplicably put quotes around the word "literally". Or more contractions here. Or here where you seem to think that parentheticals are to be used frivolously. I don't understand how to communicate the problem to you, and various other editors have tried, which leads me to believe that either you are not competent to edit here, or you're being deliberately disruptive. If there's another option, I'm happy to hear it, but if you keep editing like this, we admins will have not choice but to block you to protect the encyclopedia. Perhaps you should consider coming back in a few years when your writing skills have improved? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:57, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * More contractions and personal interpretations, more contractions, interpretive content and needless parentheticals. Interpretive analysis of what the series "implies", etc. You're creating more work for people to fix for no justifiable reason and I can only assume you've never read Manual of Style/Television. Character sections shouldn't consist of walls of interpretive content and rehashing of series plots. Brief summaries are appropriate, but articles should focus on real-world information, not WP:INUNIVERSE information. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:05, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Adding another useless parenthetical after your most recent block is not the way to demonstrate that you are a capable editor. Here's a tip: If you feel an urge to add content to an article by cramming it in between parentheses, avoid that urge. Figure out a way to incorporate the content by rephrasing a sentence, or using other normal punctuation. Parentheticals are typically misused, overused, and the make articles look like crap. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hi. Please don't add contractions into articles like you did here and here. These contravene MOS:CONTRACT and should rarely be used on Wikipedia. Thank you. Katniss ♥  22:56, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Take a Letter (Family Guy). If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''If I see you deliberately adding contractions in edits you make, I will be reporting you, once again, to administrators and your account will likely get another block. You have been disruptive repeatedly on this website and it is now getting really old. Do yourself a favor, if you're interested in continuing to edit on Wikipedia, and knock it off.'' Davejohnsan (talk) 17:49, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Friendly advice
Once again, I've noticed you adding several contractions into articles. You are being opposed by multiple editors (including an administrator) on this plus there is a whole Wikipedia policy based on not adding contractions, MOS:CONTRACT. You seem to be a great editor, but the contractions seem to continue to be a struggle. I'm not here to give you a formal warning or anything, just a bit of friendly advice to stop adding contractions into articles, otherwise at this point you are incredibly likely to be blocked if you continue down the path you are. Again, most of your edits are very good and I think you would be a great editor, if not for the continual contraction adding. So my recommendation is to continue making the good edits that you are making, but stop adding the contractions, even if you feel it sounds right or looks better. Unfortunately, if I see you continuing to add contractions, I will have to report you to an administrator, since you've gotten plenty of warnings now, and continuing to add them shows me you are being deliberately disruptive to the encyclopedia. Again, you are a fantastic editor and it would be really a shame to lose you as an editor, so please, stop adding the contractions if you want to show people that you are a good, constructive editor. Regards, Katniss   May the odds be ever in your favor ♥  21:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Indefinitely does not mean forever, but it does mean for the foreseeable future. Wikipedia requires its editors to edit competently and according to our various manuals of style. Your apparent inability to write in a professional tone and specifically to avoid contractions, is disruptive to the encyclopedia, and so I have interrupted your editing privileges to protect the project. Even after another user gave you a bit of friendly advice, you made these edits. I also believe that you are going out of your way to deliberately be disruptive, like here where you make the following changes:
 * "Hart is so hated" → "Hart's so hated"
 * "Hart is appalled" → "Hart's appalled"
 * "Margaret Foster is no longer an alcoholic" → "Margaret Foster's no longer an alcoholic"
 * "Maria is now back" → "Maria's now back"
 * "Tinsworthy is so impressed" → "Tinsworthy's so impressed"
 * "it is revealed" → "it's revealed"
 * "Hart is abducted" → "Hart's abducted"

Each one of these changes represents in my estimation a conscious decision to deviate from professional tone, and the changes, when viewed against your history of problems in this area, are indistinguishable from vandalism. You are free to request an unblock, but you will need to convince a reviewing administrator that you understand what you were blocked for, as well as provide some sort of plan for how you will edit differently in the future. Note that you are not welcome to edit at Wikipedia while this account is blocked, and any edit that can be attributed to you can be reverted by any editor with no regard for whether it was useful or not. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

A list of contraction violations made after the last block for this very thing:
 * 1
 * 2
 * 3
 * 4
 * 5
 * 6
 * 7
 * 8
 * 9
 * 10
 * 11
 * 12
 * 13
 * 14
 * 15
 * 16
 * 17
 * 18
 * 19
 * 20
 * 21
 * 22
 * 23
 * 24
 * 25
 * 26
 * 27
 * 28
 * 29
 * 30
 * 31
 * 32
 * 33
 * 34
 * 35
 * 36
 * 37
 * 38
 * 39
 * 40
 * 41
 * 42
 * 43
 * 44
 * 45
 * 46
 * 47
 * 48
 * 49
 * 50
 * 51

-- Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)