User talk:Rose Abrams/Archive 2

It was good news!
I saw the big blue 1 at my inbox in the middle of a big category cleanup and thought "oh dear, someone's already gonna revert-war?". But instead, it was the humble software saying that this was my 1000th edit! My god, that was a pleasant surprise :) Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (click to talk) 10:17, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Squatting Slavs in Tracksuits listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Squatting Slavs in Tracksuits. Since you had some involvement with the Squatting Slavs in Tracksuits redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.

I have nominated your redirect "Squatting Slavs in Tracksuits" for deletion. BirdValiant (talk) 03:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bank run, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Withdrawal ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Bank_run check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Bank_run?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your views on a page, please?
Hello Gaioa...you may recall helping me develop my article on Joe Clifford, in particular getting it to meet notability criteria. I've been working on another article about an author, Tom Pitts. After some discussion, that piece was moved to Draft mode for continued development. Mainly, it's been harder to meet notability criteria in this case. I've been doing some more work on it. I'd appreciate it if you could take a look and let me know how close you think it is to being suitable for resubmission. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tom_Pitts Thank you. Rory1262 (talk) 18:35, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * . Hi. Yes, I do remember that discussion that we had. But I'd like to point out that my scrutiny of the last article was not out of "interest". I am not by any chance more reliable than anyone else in the topic of notability, and have never been. The only reason I went into Joe Clifford was because of edit patrolling at Special:RecentChanges. Therefore, I must politely decline your request for advice. Try navigating the policies yourself - that way you'll learn in the process too. Start at WP:N and work your way to understanding Wikipedia. Kudos! Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (click to talk) 02:27, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Understood. Thanks all the same. :) Rory1262 (talk) 13:23, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you ...
... for adding humour to an infobox discussion! - I stopped commenting, find them a complete waste of time, but read of course, and your deity box made my day! I just read again what I said in 2013, - no need to change, I'll just add 2017.

Happy 2018 for you! (don't miss to click on the image of a green heart) Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)


 * (corrects tie and flickers cigarette, in gentlemanly thankfulness and humility) Hehe, thanks. All in a day's work. And humor aside, it really feels like the core argument of the anti-infobox people, making Kubrick and others appear inhuman. A high five for infobox continuity✋️! Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (talk) 13:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Call me Gerda, please, and take the tie off: the cabal of the outcasts is open for you! (That is a group started in opposition to one person alone doing TFA, - and now one of us is a TFA delegate, so we hope) - I'll add another comment to the subpage, by Voceditenore. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you but no thank you for the invite, Gerda. I have decided not to enter any WikiProjects at all, since I want to keep my interest in editing Wikipedia purely and strictly casual. Joining a gang would likely give me a participation-stress a la Facebook. So nothing personal :) Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (talk) 21:31, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * You made me smile again. I only said it's open, no? You are not the first to whom I say that you are a member by what you do ;) - I formatted your deity box, hope that was ok? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hello Gaioa. Your account has been added to the " " user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk. The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Biblio (talk) 18:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
 * Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
 * Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.
 * Sir thank you sir! I'll get on the backlog immediately! Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Gaioa. Thanks for volunteering. I've noticed you've made a number of PRODs. Would you mind re-reading WP:PRODNOM, and particularly WP:DEL-REASON, since a current article's state and current sources are generally not a good reason for proposing any kind of deletion. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 21:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Aha, I think I understand your concern. And yes, I may have marked some articles for PROD for 1) deeming bad sources as basis for non-N, rather than searching for N myself thus assuring whether or not N exist, and 2) called out some articles for being unimproved throughout a certain timespan, as if they had some kind of rule about "improvement deadline" akin to CSD#G13. But well, it's ny first day with this, and I'm learning from your advice - I just ended my patrolling session and will refresh my mind a bit, so I'll come back and do things right next time. Wikilove to you for letting me know! Also, I consider the point of PROD (calling itself "uncontroversial deletion") to be a way of saying "almost but not quite CSD" and/or "maybe CSD but not sure" - correct me if I'm wrong in this modus operandi. Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (talk) 21:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * A Prod is useful if you're sure that a page would be deleted at AFD due to failing both GNG and any SNGs, you don't expect the page creator to object, and you expect your justification to convince the admin who'll assess it (as well as any other random patrollers and page watchers who come across it). Not saying these shouldn't be deleted (or that others will necessarily agree with my assessments) just that they shouldn't be for the reasons you've stated:
 * Samuel "Savoirfaire" Williams: Need to assess against WP:NMUSIC. There are a couple of possible claims there.
 * Government Barisal College: This would have used to have been an automatic keep WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES/WP:INDAFD, but schools have been cracked down a bit in the last six months or so. Without digging, it would probably be a delete but would likely be controversial at AFD.
 * Greening the Pipeline: Multi-million dollar public works project with news coverage. Possibly too soon for an article, but certainly a merge/redirect candidate to Western Treatment Plant or Federation Trail
 * Nick Walsh (referee): Top-level referees for baseball and cricket are presumed notable. Football referees aren't, but would need a search.
 * Raymond Transportation: If something smells copypasted then use https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/ to find it, and if so then either fix + request a WP:REVDEL, or speedy WP:G12
 * ... plus your speedies for Apolonia Fier (women), KF Dajti (women), and The Door (Albania) are invalid since all compete in the (top-level) women's football championship which is at minimum a WP:CCS, and almost certainly sufficient to establish notability. I know there's a backlog at NPP, but would you please consider participating (slowly, carefully and with assessments based on notability guidelines and WP:BEFORE) at AFD instead, for the near future? Thanks, ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 22:00, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I am aware that there's a lot of documentation on N, especially about differing topics. Most of these, I browsed through. Once again, I think the mistake I did was to base my judgement solely on sources present as opposed to search myself. So yes, I agree that the bottom line here is sit down and have a cup of tea. Well, sorry you had to follow my tracks and clean up my mess, but maybe that's all in a day's work for you, kind sir or madam :) One more thing: is there a quick way to access the "Find sources" links on the bottom of notability? If there was an addon or something for just autogenerating these links on any article's interface, that would be perfect. I bet my right arm that there is and I've not heard of it. Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (talk) 22:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The reason I suggest AFD is that it's a gentler ramp because you can see on what grounds others assess an article's notability (ideally including the closing admin when there are competing arguments). Sorry, no idea re any add-on. Cheers, ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 22:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Wonderful, and I'll look for such an addon - surely someone must share my need. Thanks for everything! Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (talk) 22:39, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

New Year (Auld Lang Syne)
I think your addition of an explicit mention that we bid farewell to the old year on New Year's Eve can be left in place. Given we're talking about the conventional Gregorian new year there's only one moment we can logically "farewell" it, so the calendar reference is just a little redundant, but the redundancy doesn't "grate", and the resulting text remains clear and consecutive. More importantly, the link between bidding farewell to the new year and the other "farewell" uses of the song mentioned in the next sentence is not lost. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 13:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

List of highest-grossing non-English films
Hi, the issue of which country is the film's origin does not always have a clear answer. That is why sometimes multiple countries are/should be listed. For example if you look at films such as The Hobbit (film series), which if you only use one country to identify it, would it really be accurate to only list New Zealand and not the United States? There are many examples I'm sure you are aware of.

A second point I want to point out is the nature of co-production between mainland China and Hong Kong film industries. Today, there are Hong Kong films does not have mainland financing/investments, but these are typically small art-house films. In terms of big budget commercial film-making (such as The Monkey King series), the clear exact line between what is considered mainland China and Hong Kong film productions is very much vague, even professionals would find it difficult to define it. They are typically financed by mainland China production companies (source Variety ) and are primarily targeted at mainland China market. That is why when it comes to films like these co-productions, it is hard to categorize them.--Getareu8 (talk) 12:56, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Uh, let's take this on the article-specific talk instead. Don't wanna WP:OWN this article more than necessary. Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (t,c,l) 14:43, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom Notice
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Cassianto behavior, per WP:5P4]] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks,


 * Please note that I have removed your statement as it made accusations about other editors without presenting any evidence. You can find your statement in the page history and please do feel free to re-add it with links to diffs that demonstrate what you said.  GoldenRing (talk) 14:08, 24 January 2018 (UTC)


 * In that case I'll leave it. Feels like too much of a hassle to go through with an issue I didn't see as WP-breaking. Enjoy your case. Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (t,c,l) 16:49, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
&mdash; Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 21:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hmpf. I find it a bit sad that some editing must be followed by some sort of Miranda warning. It feels like it just strays further from the spirit of "free editing for all". But well, if Arbcom finds it necessary, who am I to question? Cheers for the coffee. Already knew all of it, but thanks anyway. Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa  (t,c,l) 21:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey, if I had it my way we'd just allow the ds/editnotices to be sufficient warning (seems like any logical person would know to read something that noticeable ... but alas, a lot of wikilawyering got people off the hook for DS violations at AE... and now this is the result: all editors have to get one of these for the page restriction system to work at all). You're not the first person to complain about this new requirement having to be implemented in such an "axe in place of a scalpel" routine, but there's sadly nothing I can do about it. It's either get yelled at by editors for not giving them one of these, or being yelled at by editors for giving them one (I realize you're not yelling... but there have been a few in the past 48 hours that haven't been so pleasant). It really is like being stuck between a rock and a hard place. &mdash; Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 06:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

'Murica listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect &. Since you had some involvement with the 'Murica redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Spirit of the Beehive
Why did you remove this film when it has 22 reviews? ♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Because it had no critics consensus! That what we decided on, not the 20 reviews mark! Thank you. Gaioa  (t,c,l) 16:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah OK, seems a reasonable way to assess it. Must take ages to check them all though! Thanks for doing this!♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Civility in infobox discussions case opened
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 17, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: New Year Backlog Drive results:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
 * We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!
 * We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
 * Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

Re: Mentiri
Presumably you wanted to notify, who wrote the article, not me. fansite doesn't really seem appropriate here; if you're concerned about POV, a simple POV might by better. I'm also a little surprised by overly detailed: on the whole it seems like a fairly reasonably locality article. What would you like trimmed? I'd recommend summarising specific concerns on the talk page. Cheers,—Ketil Trout (&lt;&gt;&lt;!) 16:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry. The Page Curation script sent that message to you, not me. Also, what I meant was that the article had an overall tone of "come visit our town" or "look how awesome my hometown is". It focused more on the quality of life in the city than basic facts such as number of inhabitants and history. Thank you. Gaioa  (t,c,l) 21:56, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. I'd probably use advert for those sorts of issues.—Ketil Trout (&lt;&gt;&lt;!) 07:50, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of last words


The article List of last words has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "A collection of quotes belongs to Wikiquote, not to Wikipedia. In fact, on Wikiquote there is already a more complete list, namely q:Last words, so there is no need to have this page here."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Superchilum (talk to me!) 08:56, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Quoth my edit summary:  Thank you.  Gaioa  (t,c,l) 17:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Is it possible that the author of an article remove the proposal of deletion without waiting for a discussion? And when he creates and article, he fills a list dedicated to "WikiSnobs" that will propose that article for deletion? You didn't answer to the main reason: a collection of quotes is not Wikipedia, it's Wikiquote, and it already exists there. If that list has some problems, it's better to improve that one rather than this one. Let the discussion go on, please. -- Superchilum (talk to me!) 08:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * YES! You just broke the rules by reinserting a PROD - PRODs can be removed by anyone at anytime and warrants zero discussion from either part. Read before doing. Also, there is no rule that states  or   as you seem to think. We have tons and tons of article about quotations of different kinds, including lists of quotations, such as this, this, and of course all of this. What I resented was the people who always believe that all forms of "trivia" is unsuitable for WP. But no, Manual of Style/Trivia sections does not apply to stand-alone pages, Handling trivia is just an essay and don't even give much solid arguments, and we have previously kept articles such as List of unusual deaths, List of inventors killed by their own inventions, List of films that most frequently use the word "fuck", and their respective deletion discussions. All of this, I've already stated on the talk. Feels so pointless to go through it again with someone who don't even know how PROD works. Open a AfD instead if you're that concerned, buddy. Thank you.  Gaioa  (t,c,l) 16:45, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm very very sorry. I thought Proposed deletion was intended to open a discussion, but that's Article for deletion instead, now I understand your reaction. Sorry again, I'll be more careful in the future. -- Superchilum (talk to me!) 17:15, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry if I came off as hostile before. Let me help you avoid the same mistakes in the future:
 * For most cases of deletion, the Articles for deletion (AFD) policy applies. This will create a full discussion and be closed by an admin when consensus is reached.
 * For uncontroversial deletion, the Proposed deletion (PROD) policy applies. This will make an admin delete an article without discussion after 7 days, unless anyone objects.
 * For obvious and quick deletion, the Speedy deletion (CSD) policy apples. This will call the attention of an admin to delete the article immediately, if it meets a very strict criterion or criteria.
 * I further recommend the add-on Twinkle to do any of these actions easily. Cheers and good wikiing! Gaioa  (t,c,l) 22:08, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Image at Cold-weather warfare
You are invited to join a discussion at Talk:Cold-weather warfare. Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 21:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions closed
An arbitration case regarding civility in infobox discussions has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:


 * 1) Any uninvolved administrator may apply infobox probation as a discretionary sanction.  See the full decision for details of infobox probation.
 * 2) Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes.
 * 3) Cassianto is indefinitely placed on infobox probation.
 * 4) The Arbitration Committee recommends that well-publicized community discussions be held to address whether to adopt a policy or guideline addressing what factors should weigh in favor of or against including an infobox in a given article and how those factors should be weighted.
 * 5) All editors are reminded to maintain decorum and civility when engaged in discussions about infoboxes, and to not turn discussions about a single article's infobox into a discussion about infoboxes in general.
 * 6) For canvassing editors to this case, Volvlogia (talk · contribs) is admonished. They are warned that any further instances of canvassing related to arbitration processes will likely result in sanctions.


 * Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard

For the arbitration committee, GoldenRing (talk) 08:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (List of last words) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating List of last words, Gaioa!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"An interesting, well-compiled and well-referenced list."

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! ACTRIAL:
 * ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing
 * Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking  place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
 * While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

Nomination of Video game curse for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Video game curse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Video game curse until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:15, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Video game curse listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Video game curse. Since you had some involvement with the Video game curse redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:00, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:
 * WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags
 * Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:
 * A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons
 * There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy
 * Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English News Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.
 * Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
 * The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive! Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
 * Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: NPPbarnstar SE.png. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: RR3217-0014 100 rubles USSR 1989 Gold avers.png, Swiss-Commemorative-Coin-1991-CHF-250-reverse.png, Coin of Kazakhstan 500Thinker averse.png, US-$1000-SC-1878-FR-346a-PROOF.jpg.
 * Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers. Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
 * June backlog drive


 * New technology, new rules
 * New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
 * Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
 * Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.


 * Editathons
 * Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The Signpost
 * The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

Concern regarding Draft:List of bizarre laws
Hello, Gaioa. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of bizarre laws, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 12:35, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.


 * Project news
 * The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
 * As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.


 * There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See New pages patrol/Coordination for more info to see if you can help out.


 * Other
 * A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.


 * Moving to Draft and Page Mover
 * Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
 * If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
 * Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
 * The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
 * The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Russian Sleep Experiment


A tag has been placed on Russian Sleep Experiment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=861115731&action=compare&url=https%3A%2F%2Faminoapps.com%2Fc%2Furban-legends-cryptids%2Fpage%2Fblog%2Fthe-russian-sleep-experiment%2Fo4Gv_kquduB6Vg5aV77bxaQmNkwwPnzw50. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Moxy (talk) 07:26, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
 * Backlog


 * Community Wishlist Proposal
 * There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
 * Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!


 * Project updates
 * ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
 * There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.


 * New scripts
 * User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js(info) — A new script created for quickly placing copyvio-revdel on a page.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018
Hello ,
 * Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
 * Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.


 * If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.


 * We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.


 * With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018
Hello ,

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
 * Reviewer of the Year
 * Thanks are also extended for their work to (15,059 reviews),  (12,760reviews),  (9,001reviews),  (8,440reviews),  (8,092reviews),   (5,306reviews),  (4,153 reviews),  (4,016reviews),  and  (3,615reviews)., , , and  have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only sevenmonths, while , with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top100 reviewers.

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
 * Less good news, and an appeal for some help

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
 * Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minutevideo was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Training video

Question about a redirect
Hi. I was reviewing new redirects, and I came across 🥰. Can I ask what this has to do with the redirect's target (Romance (love))? --DannyS712 (talk) 07:55, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, because the emoji clearly symbolizes "being in love" and the article is about "being in love". I don't understand the question. Gaioa  (T C L) 20:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * sorry, it showed up as just an empty box (I think it was ☐) when I was on my computer. Sorry for the trouble; the redirect makes total sense. —DannyS712 (talk) 22:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm back on my computer, and again it looks like a black box... --DannyS712 (talk) 02:08, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17


Hello ,


 * News
 * The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.


 * Discussions of interest
 * Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
 * db-blankdraft was merged into G13 (Discussion)
 * A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
 * There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.


 * Reminders
 * NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD  because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.


 * NPP Tools Report
 * Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
 * copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
 * The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828 Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review. Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Beach episode


Hello, Gaioa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beach episode".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Is there life on Mars? listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Is there life on Mars?. Since you had some involvement with the Is there life on Mars? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question)  23:59, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

MfD
Hey, just a reminder that you need to transclude deletion debates on the relevant page - I just added Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Times that 100 Wikipedians supported an RFX to WP:MFD. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 19:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah, of course! Sorry, slipped my mind. Thanks. Gaioa  (T C L) 11:20, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kimberly Loaiza
Hello Gaioa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kimberly Loaiza for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Isingness (talk) 23:36, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kimberly Loaiza


The article Kimberly Loaiza has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 08:51, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RayWilliamJohnson EqualsThree.png
Thanks for uploading File:RayWilliamJohnson EqualsThree.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Badabun for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Badabun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Badabun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. letcreate123 (talk) 19:51, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

"Zero G flight" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Zero G flight. Since you had some involvement with the Zero G flight redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 05:21, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Missing source
I removed a number of entries at List of projected death tolls from nuclear attacks on cities which were sourced to a dead Dropbox link. You had originally added it here, do you know what the original source may have been? –dlthewave ☎ 18:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Doki Doki Literature Club! can make a Hebrew Version?
I was thinking of making a Hebrew version f the page "Doki Doki Literature Club!", i think pages like this should be in the Hebrew Wikipedia and too bad they arn't...Dimwit1234567 (talk) 12:34, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Go right ahead friend! Just make sure to write the article at Hebrew-language Wikipedia, such as at this link.The Translation Tool could provide useful if you don't want to do it by hand. Gaioa  (T C L) 14:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Vegetta777 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vegetta777 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vegetta777 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. dmartin969 02:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Cold-weather warfare
Hi Gaioa, perhaps you could add some perspective to the discussion at Talk:Cold-weather warfare Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 20:14, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

"Feminist nationalism" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Feminist nationalism. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 17:57, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

"Corporate city" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Corporate city. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 02:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

"Chinese SSR" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Chinese SSR. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 02:32, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

"Demo-1" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Demo-1. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 17 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 20:22, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Feminist music
Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 20:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * How exactly was such a redirect an attack page?? I'm genuinely curious about your reasoning. Even the admin that came to check didn't agree and rejected deletion. Gaioa  (T C L) 10:04, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Not responding? Oh well. But please train some WP:AGF, and think twice before slamming an innocent writer with that threatening template. Gaioa  (T C L) 16:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Wow, it was a mistake. I always try and assume good faith, I genuinely thought it was an attack page. No need to slam me on your talk page either. Thanks, Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 01:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

"Bonjwa" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bonjwa. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 20:03, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Military marching commands moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Military marching commands, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  scope_creep Talk  20:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Military marching commands has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Military marching commands. Thanks!  scope_creep Talk  20:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

"List of highest medals" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of highest medals. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 15:46, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of last words in fiction for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of last words in fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of last words in fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rorshacma (talk) 16:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Missing cite in Metamorphosis (manga)
The article cites "Shindo 2016" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: User:Svick/HarvErrors.js to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 23:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅. That short-cite template was pure Greek to me, so I fixed it with a full cite instead. Maybe it wouldn't be good to link it to the "Publications" sections anyway. Gaioa  (T C L) 00:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Russian Sleep Experiment for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Russian Sleep Experiment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Russian Sleep Experiment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BD2412 T 23:13, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ECrew Development Program has been accepted
 ECrew Development Program, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=ECrew_Development_Program help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! SK2242 (talk) 14:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Requesting permission to use the image on deepfakeDebankitabasu (talk) 16:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Debankita Basu
Hi,

I wrote a blog on Medium on deepfake. Is it okay if I use the image of the 'Man of Steel' movie you have on this site https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepfake? Please let me know. I didn't know how else to contact you.
 * Information about re-use is available on the image's description page. You might also be interested in general re-use instructions. Gaioa  (T C L) 16:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Metamorphosis (manga)
Hi, I noticed you reverted my recent addition of a short description to switch back to the item description on Wikidata. However, item descriptions should start with a lowercase letter, which necessitates setting the short description locally in order to properly format it. – Rummskartoffel (talk • contribs) 13:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh really? Sorry, had no idea. Will change the WD desc back right away. Gaioa  (T C L) 14:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of highest-scoring Reddit posts
Hello, Gaioa. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of highest-scoring Reddit posts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Loss
I can't express the loss I feel at the reversion of my edit to the Internet meme page.

( ￗ﹏ￗ)

In all seriousness though, I can imagine why people might want to keep it to a minimum, given the infinite swell of memes. I'll probably add the text alone and put the image on the List of internet phenomena. It doesn't feel the same though. Joe  (talk) 09:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , If it makes you feel better, there is already a article on Loss (comic) where the minimalist reproductions are mentioned. Gaioa  (T C L) 09:19, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Cheers Gaioa .  Joe  (talk) 09:23, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Deepfake example.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Deepfake example.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dylsss(talk contribs) 14:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If you know of freely licenced deepfakes, then don't just talk about it. Upload a good one and put it in the article's top. Gaioa  (T C L) 15:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Dictators - Kim Jong-Un by RepresentUs.webm and File:Vladimir Putin warning Americans on election interference and increasing political divide.webm (though I prsonally question the freeness of these considering deepfakes are made using existing images). But WP:NFCC does not requie me to produce one, in fact it does not even require one to exist at all, it just requires that one could be created. Dylsss(talk contribs) 15:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , That was not a rhetorical question to counter your claim. I just asked you to solve the problem since you evidently know what material to use. Gaioa  (T C L) 13:12, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Gaioa

Thank you for creating Maha Sithu of Twinthin.

User:Tamzin, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-- Tamzin (she/they) &#124; o toki tawa mi. 06:31, 27 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Ya know what, I have no memory to why I created that page or how I found the redir target. I have no interest or connection with the topic and don't care about it either. I'm authorizing you to mark it as WP:CSD if you want to. Gaioa  (T C L) 07:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. I talked with someone who's better at historical research than I am, and we walked away fairly confident that it's not a valid alternative name (and thus presumably a weird idiosyncracy or hoax, on the part of the original creator), so I've gone ahead and G7'd. Thanks.  -- Tamzin (she/they) &#124; o toki tawa mi. 07:35, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

"Lesbos Autonomous Municipality"
Hello, Gaioa. I came across a couple of your subpages that are of questionable encyclopaedic quality, namely User:Gaioa/sandbox/lesbos (3), User:Gaioa/sandbox/lesbos (3)/am, and User:Gaioa/sandbox/empress. In addition, there is related material in the page histories of User:Gaioa/sandbox/lesbos (3)/conflict and User:Gaioa/sandbox/lesbos (3)/end. My concerns are that they may qualify as hoaxes, or at least misusing Wikipedia as a webhost. I am notifying you of my concerns because I wish to avoid having to nominate them at miscellany for deletion. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

WP:DELTALK vs. WP:TALKOWN
With respect, the justification for your revert here at User talk:JoshFight was incorrect; WP:DELTALK is mainly in reference to outright deletion of talk and user talk pages, not the mere blanking of sections – the relevant guideline for this practice can be found at WP:TALKOWN. While there are certain notices users may explicitly not remove from their talk pages and I'm personally not a fan of removing anything apart from bot messages, either, the editor acted fully within their right to manage their own user talk here, especially since the messages in question are over a month old. I don't assume you were acting in bad faith here, but I do think this is worth pointing out. Thanks!  Angry Harpy   talk 12:56, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hunt Down The Freeman
Hello, Gaioa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hunt Down The Freeman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Red Sun in the Sky
Hello, Gaioa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Red Sun in the Sky, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Learn From Lei Feng's Good Example
Hello, Gaioa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Learn From Lei Feng's Good Example, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Military inspection
Hello, Gaioa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Military inspection, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Gaioa. After reviewing your request, I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AGaioa enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! - TheresNoTime 😺 12:04, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Ping glitch
You can ignore that ping. It was a glitch caused by tweaking the indentation on your comment while adding a new comment of my own, which I guess mw:Extension:Echo interpreted as me pinging you. I'm looking into whether I need to file a bug for this. -- Tamzin [cetacean needed] (she/they) 11:07, 8 August 2021 (UTC)