User talk:Roseddo

Welcome!
Hello, Roseddo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Romaine (talk) 23:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * PS: The project page can be found at: Benelux Education Program/Maastricht University/FPN Historical Book Review Spring 2017. Romaine (talk) 23:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Feedback on your article
Hello Roseddo, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. I especially will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay. I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our next meeting. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 10:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Intro sentence: You try to put too much in the first sentence. Use the first sentence to mention the medium, author, his profession, his nationality, publication date, place of publication. Use the second sentence (and following sentences) for telling what the book is about.
 * Links: Missing!
 * Headers: Please check other Wikipedia articles, do not capitalise full headers. And use for the headers == Structure == instead of === Structure ===.
 * References: A good start, but please use more references.
 * Context/timeframe: Missing!
 * How was the book received: Missing!
 * Other: Please remove all the bold text in your article, including in the headers. Only use bold in the intro sentence. The second paragraph reads too much like a book report. This is not a book report but an encyclopedic article.
 * Hello Roseddo, Thank you for improving your article! Last week we specifically asked to make sure you add sources/references to your article, because that is one of the most important parts of a Wikipedia article. We also wanted to make sure the intro sentence/section is ready. Let's see how it is going now.
 * Intro sentence: Good.
 * Links: Good start, but a lot more are needed.
 * Headers: Thank you for fixing the headers, but not everything was fixed. I changed some strange look to normal headers. Not needed to write the S as capital s: "The 1920s and Sexuality".
 * References: Sufficient sources, but more are welcome.
 * Context/timeframe: Good.
 * How was the book received: Missing!
 * Keep up the good work! Romaine (talk) 03:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Roseddo, The image you had requested to be scanned has been kept (and not deleted) because it is too simple to be copyrighted. I just added it to your sandbox article. Romaine (talk) 02:34, 1 June 2017 (UTC)