User talk:Rosemary Willis Sullivan

In response to your feedback
Hi there! I saw your problem in your response. You said that you did not cite sources for your edits. You need to cite sources so that Wikipedians will know that the information you are adding is accurate. Also, we summarize edits, like in a nutshell.

Learn more: Tutorial/Citing sources

Have a nice day, God bless and have a nice stay here at Wikipedia!

Jedd Raynier (talk) 05:37, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
You probably came across a deletionist, they usually just delete articles and then let the user go through the process of trying to restore it. My advice is that if your article meets the standards for inclusion, then complain (a lot) on the page on the one who deleted the article and if that doesn't work, grab hold of some admin and see if he can do something.

Juice  Leskinen  07:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
In essense, it is better if Wikipedia articles are small. This makes it easier to handle them in case if people using the articles for disinformation and propaganda. The big bloated articles often seen can take months or even years to clean up. Whoever shortened the article did you a huge favour.

Btw, welcome to Wikipedia!

Juice  Leskinen  07:15, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
Wikipedia has an extremely low standard of what counts as a source, so give it a try.

Juice  Leskinen  07:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

&#160;