User talk:Rosguill/Archive 23

Reviewed...
Shalom, Rosguill! My user notice box received a notice that the page Yaniv Iczkovits "was reviewed" by you. However, I didn't see any comments on the Talk page or elsewhere. (This is my first experience in this situation; I generally don't create or translate pages.) So I'd like to understand how to proceed from here. Does "reviewed" mean that you agree with the page as it stands at present, with all the warning templates in place, including the blanking of nonsourced content (rather than a "Citation needed" template) in the initial page evaluation by User:Theroadislong? -- Deborahjay (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm pretty sure I reviewed a redirect pointing at that article, Yaniv Itskovich, not the article itself. So, in this case reviewing just means that the redirect is fine as a likely alternative spelling of Iczkovits' name. signed,Rosguill talk 20:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * My inattention and wishful thinking here, . The page you reviewed was indeed the alternative spelling for which I made a #REDIRECT. Despite my extensive experience with writing European Jewish surnames in numerous languages (being a retired translator for the archives of the Ghetto Fighters' House museum), I'm baffled by "Iczkovits" where the "cz" represents the Hebrew "tsade" and the final "ts" is "tsade-geresh". (Apologies for forgetting my IPA.) The subject is Israeli-born and I don't know his parents' origins - which in today's Israel can be a delicate question, though I'm sure Dr. Iczkovits would understand my curiosity at least on academic grounds. If you have an idea, I'd be glad to hear it. Cheers -- Deborahjay (talk) 21:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , the cz digraph used to be used to make a צ sound in Hungarian (there was an orthographic reform that changed it to just use c), and cz makes a similar sound ( /ʈ͡ʂ/) in Polish apparently. My guess is that, given the use of both cz and ts digraphs, the name's origin is probably Polish and was probably pronounced itch-ko-vits, but Hebrew lacks that first consonant so it got simplified to its-ko-vits. signed,Rosguill talk 21:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Unsurprising,, as Hungarian is notoriously daunting even to avid polyglots and wannabes (as myself). Hungarian-born Holocaust survivors living in Israel (now in their mid-70s and older) likely missed out on schooling, and their children (my age cohort) picked up some of the spoken language if at all. Now that this is on my info radar, I'll watch for similar instances. Thanks again! -- Deborahjay (talk) 09:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Kuala Lumpur Football Association
I didnt check if the original text was copyvio since I just splitted the article, but apparently the website took the text from Wikipedia and not the otherwise, it has been in the original wiki article way longer then on the website according to wayback archive. Snowflake91 (talk) 23:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , I think the content that I removed on UNDUE grounds was probably taken from a promotional site, for what it's worth. signed,Rosguill talk 00:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Block needed for LTA
Hello Rosguill, would it be possible to block as soon as possible? They're a sock of the LTA Evlekis. Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 20:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , ✅, even if we ignored sock issues, they're clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. signed,Rosguill talk 20:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks Rosguill, that was - was pretty sure about who they were from the attack subpages, but those edit summaries were final proof. Not that I live there anyway, lol. Pahunkat (talk) 20:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * On that note, could you please revoke sock number 2's TP access? Thanks Pahunkat (talk) 20:47, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , ✅ signed,Rosguill talk 20:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , thanks again :-) Pahunkat (talk) 20:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

User:Kochas and patrolling
I see you granted the NPR right to this user just yesterday, yet he made some very questionable patrols. See the multiple deletion tag notifications on my talk page. Starzoner (talk) 01:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 10
You didn't delete the pages. Do you still plan to do the histsplit or is that because of the XFDcloser bug? 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , hm, I'm actually not sure what happened here. I had intended to delete without splitting, but this would be the first time I've run into an XfDcloser bug when deleting a page, so far I'd only seen problems with Keep and equivalents. At this point I think it's fine to leave as is per Tavix's comment. signed,Rosguill talk 17:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah, I didn't notice fixed it. What do you think would be the best step to do with the ~40 (I think) similar redirects? Maybe you could fix them as well if I list them, Tavix? 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * ...and I didn't notice this thread existed. I saw that the links were still blue, so I went to delete them and decided it'd be marginally more useful to history split them. If you list them on a subpage somewhere, I can go through and histsplit and/or speedy delete them per WP:G6. -- Tavix ( talk ) 18:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Well, I only opened this thread a couple hours ago. I am currently re-executing the query, which can take 15 minutes or so, and will let you know when it's done. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I listed them on a subpage somewhere, let me know if you need them linked or something. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Nice name! 😀 Yes, I need them linked, but it's not a big deal to add. I'll go through them as I have time. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Deleting a redirect
Hi, could you look at deleting one of my redirects, Halime Hatun (fictional character), please as it’s the target page and correct title for Halime Sultan (fictional character)? There is strong consensus for this move. Thank you. IronManCap (talk) 18:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , ✅, although in the future you can add a request like this to the CSD queue by tagging the target page with a WP:G6 CSD tag. signed,Rosguill talk 20:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, although it had actually already been done and it seems you mistakenly moved it back. Sorry for the mishap and unclear communication, and thanks for the help and advice. IronManCap (talk) 21:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Rosguill, I think you may have deleted the article by mistake, could you have a look at reverting it please? IronManCap (talk) 21:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , ack sorry, I misunderstood what you were asking for. I've restored it now. As for the originally intended request, I'm not sure I see why you would want that deleted, as it appears to be a valid redirect from an alternative name. signed,Rosguill talk 21:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, the redirect was the intended article name, that’s why I was requesting deletion. Doesn’t matter now, thanks for the help. I probably should have told you the request was already done. IronManCap (talk) 21:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , ah gotcha, sorry for the extra mixup. signed,Rosguill talk 21:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

NPP permissions
Hi, you recently declined me for NPP permissions. I have since enrolled at the new page patrol school. After I completed this would it be nessescary to wait a few months again before reapplying? Thanks, Skingo12 (talk) 01:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , passing NPPSCHOOL is sufficient on its own. signed,Rosguill talk 02:08, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

99.35.9.65
Can user:99.35.9.65 please be blocked ASAP? CLCStudent (talk) 21:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ for 72 hours signed,Rosguill talk 21:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Regarding adoption
Hello Rosguill, I want to join NPP School. I saw your name at the list of trainers. So could you please adopt me? It will be a great experience to be your trainee. Thank you! – Kammil  ⟨talk⟩ 18:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , sure. Before we begin, could you describe a bit about your prior experience, if any, with notability guidelines, deletion policies, and other new page patrol-adjacent work? signed,Rosguill talk 19:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , as a Counter Vandalism Unit Academy graduate, I do fight vandalism and related and I am very active there. I'm a recent changes patroller. As of now I don't have much experience of new page partol or something similar. To gain experience and work from another perspective on Wikipedia, I want to join the NPP school. Thanks,  Kammil  ⟨talk⟩ 05:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , ok, I've set up a page for you at User:Rosguill/Kamilalibhat NPPSCHOOL. Feel free to begin whenever you're ready. signed,Rosguill talk 16:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , thanks!  Kammil  ⟨talk⟩ 16:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

RfD close screwed up template
Hey, just letting you know that your RfD close for some reason screwed up the code of R from alternative punctuation by breaking the redirect. I think I've fixed it to what you intended to do. Elliot321 (talk &#124; contribs) 03:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , XfDcloser has been behaving a bit erratically lately. I thought I followed up on all the closes I did but I guess I missed this one. Thanks for cleaning up. signed,Rosguill talk 04:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * It's not just the code that was wrong. It's the fact that it was changed at all. The RfD was about two redirects, and the result was to retarget just the other one. This mistake has had a devastating effect on Database reports/Linked misspellings, which yesterday, prior to this error, had 23 entries, and today was truncated at its maximum size of 1000, which only brought it up to the early "E" entries.  M AN d ARAX  •  XAЯA b ИA M  22:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * This should resolve itself in a day, right? Elliot321 (talk &#124; contribs) 00:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The database report is generated by a bot once a day, so it should get back to normal after someone restores R from alternative punctuation to the correct redirect. M AN d ARAX  •  XAЯA b ИA M  01:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I've restored it as a redirect to R from alternative spelling. Elliot321 (talk &#124; contribs) 01:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! M AN d ARAX  •  XAЯA b ИA M  01:13, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Moving a page
Hi again, could you help with moving Artuk Bey (fictional character to Artuk Bey (fictional character) please? I think it might be obvious what’s wrong with the title currently. Thanks. IronManCap (talk) 16:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , looks like this was fixed already? signed,Rosguill talk 16:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, it seems it’s been fixed now, thanks anyway. IronManCap (talk) 16:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Could you also move Turgut Bey (fictional character) to Turgut Alp (fictional character), as the title is the character's alias currently? Thanks. IronManCap (talk) 09:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

NPR requests for permissions
Hi,. A few days ago, and I applied at Requests for permissions/New page reviewer for NPR permissions. If you have the time, I was hoping you could look at our requests and the more recent one from to clear out the backlog. I'm not sure how often these requests are reviewed, but you're the only admin I know who specializes in NPP, so I came to you.  TheTechnician27  (Talk page)  17:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'll try to take a look soon. The last weeks have been a bit busy, and I try to avoid hogging the spotlight at the perm request page even during lighter times, but I try to keep the backlog there around a week or so at most. signed,Rosguill talk 17:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem! Thanks for the quick response.  TheTechnician27  (Talk page)  17:51, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Putting my hat in the charity bin
Hey, Rosguill, would you mind taking my NPP rights back? I was enthusiastic about it at first, but ultimately I don't think it's something I'm cut out for/can balance well with my other on-wiki duties, and I'd rather give up that user right than have it sit around looking to all the world like hat collecting. Also, I was in part doing it to learn the ropes for CSD/PROD, but I quit AfD a few days ago, so I can't really see the point. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 06:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm sorry that you feel it's not working out. Given that your current permissions are temporary and set to expire in a few weeks, I think it would probably be better to just let them peter out on their own come mid-March. signed,Rosguill talk 17:13, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * That's reasonable, I just don't want the hat-collecting look. I may try it again at some future point if opportunities work out; I don't hope to be gone from AfD forever (it's a mental health break due to an interaction with a specific person I feel unsafe around), and I did enjoy some of the process, but I overall found the workload more intense than I'd expected and I think all those factors combined poorly. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 21:13, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , I totally understand, and I don't think anyone is going to accuse you of hat collecting. NPP can be overwhelming when you're first getting started, so let me know if you ever want to give it another go. signed,Rosguill talk 21:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

NPR request
Hi,. Thanks for reviewing my submission. I am happy to see your advice on notability and I am learning daily. If it's ok with you then I like to apply for a month of NPR permissions. After 1 month, you can examine my contributions and If you see me as a good fit then only I will intent to reapply afterward. Your advice and guidance mean a lot to me. Hulatam (talk) 07:45, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , I don't think you're ready for a trial run just yet. Please fix up the articles you've created that sill have maintenance templates and put more distance between your current work and your past deleted contributions. signed,Rosguill talk 17:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for your great response. I have fixed the issues and updated the article please check. I hope it's ok now. Sure, I will be put more distance between my current work and past deleted contributions and I am very sorry for my starting contributions because at that time I just started so wasn't aware of the notability guidelines. But as far now I am well familiar with WP:GNG, WP:NPOV, WP:SIGCOV and as well as WP:NPROF and all others. I can assure you that I will do the best work from my side. If given permission for only 1 month I can show my potential and good faith edits. If you see my past contributions I mostly edit pages from New pages feed and help new and old users in assisting their pages. When I see any page fails in adhering to Wikipedia guidelines or likely spam I nominate them for deletion. I will be thankful if given permission for only 1 month. After that, if you see me as a good fit then only I intent to reapply afterward. Thanks for your great contributions. Hulatam (talk) 05:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I don't think you're ready for the permissions. Your work at Azadeh Shirazi suggests that you don't understand the importance of using secondary sources. And distance includes time. I'd suggest you keep editing for several months before you consider reapplying. signed,Rosguill talk 06:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg TJMSmith
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Boing! said Zebedee • Hiberniantears • Lear's Fool • Only • WGFinley

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news
 * A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
 * A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
 * A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Page mover/delete-redirect.
 * A request for comment asks if sysops may place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions?
 * There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.

Technical news
 * When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
 * When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
 * There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (T275322).

Arbitration
 * By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people. Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions.
 * The Kurds and Kurdistan case was closed, authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed.

Miscellaneous
 * Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello
Hi Rosguill, hope you are fine. I was a bit busy in my home. I will continue to work from today. Thank you! – Kammill  ⟨talk⟩ 05:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , all good, don't feel bad about taking breaks if you need them. signed,Rosguill talk 05:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

2021 Liga 1
Hi there. Why do you change the redirect in 2021 Liga 1 from Liga 1 (Indonesia) to a Dab page Liga 1? Wira rhea (talk) 21:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , because someone searching for 2021 Liga 1 may be looking for any of the leagues at Liga 1, not necessarily the Indonesian one. signed,Rosguill talk 22:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , because all previous season of Liga 1 (Indonesia) were named like that (2020 Liga 1 for example) so maybe people here already knew that, like Liga I (Romanian league) always two years-based (2020–21) and Peruvian Primera División using 2021 Liga 1 (Peru). Or should I renamed all of them, for instance 2020 Liga 1 (Indonesia) instead? Wira rhea (talk) 22:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , it doesn't seem like any of the leagues are a clear primary topic for Liga 1, so using YYYY Liga 1 (Indonesia) for the season titles is probably the clearest solution. signed,Rosguill talk 23:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , well then, I'll rename them all. Regards, Wira rhea (talk) 23:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi again
Hey,. I've mostly been sticking to video game-related subjects in the new page review, and I think it's been working out well. I always enjoy giving articles like Video Checkers and Math Gran Prix a few touches when they hit the new page review list and then sending them on their way or fundamentally overhauling high-profile articles like Aliens: Fireteam. It's really a joy.

With that out of the way, there's a, uh... backlog of articles by one fairly new user. They're all about otome games, all of which are published by D3 Publisher. And you might say, "Oh, sounds like a COI, right?" Having checked their editing history, I earnestly don't think that's the case. I think they're just very passionate, which is why I came to a more experienced editor about this. The articles in question are:


 * Saikin Koi Shiteru?
 * Suto*Mani: Strobe*Mania
 * Mermaid Prism
 * Little Anchor
 * My Secret Pets!
 * Office Lovers
 * Forbidden Romance
 * Last Escort
 * Vitamin (video game series)
 * Reijou Tantei Office no Jikenbo
 * Ore no Shita de Agake
 * Kurayami no Hate de Kimi wo Matsu
 * Hoshizora no Comic Garden
 * Signal (video game)
 * Roland (Japanese host) (not otome or D3, but fits the same mold; the lead section literally had (removed for unsourced BLP) "His blood type is AB.")

For some of these like Mermaid Prism, they seem like a fairly obvious case of AfD for notability (I'd say PRODed, but I get the feeling it'd be opposed by the article's creator), but for others like Vitamin (video game series) and Last Escort (this one was previously deleted, but no AfD discussion), I have literally no idea how I would even approach them short of removing the GameFAQs links – this is made even worse because I don't speak Japanese and therefore can't reasonably perform WP:BEFORE for articles I think should be nominated. I don't even know what I would ask the creator of these articles to do to remedy this if I were to reach out to them, and while I'd feel bad tearing down hours upon hours of passioante work, I really don't even feel like I could determine what work needs to be torn down in the first place without a working knowledge of Japanese. I just know these articles can't be left sitting in review limbo (as every single one of their articles currently is), and they're clearly unfit for the mainspace in their current state – even if some of them technically make it through the NPR flowchart. Moreover, even the hours upon hours it would take to get through all of these wouldn't even fix the problem, because their creator is uploading multiple of these per day at this point.

I hate to use the word WP:FANCRUFT, but TL;DR: WP:FANCRUFT.  TheTechnician27  (Talk page)  22:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , without having gone through most of the links, you may want to try to reach out to them to talk a bit about how notability works, see if you can get them to understand the problem (and potentially commit to fixing whichever ones can be improved). Part of the problem with covering otaku topics on Wikipedia is that not only is there very little English coverage, even the Japanese coverage tends to be very low quality non-independent and gossip sources, but these are often considered authoritative by the fan base. I usually take a relatively lenient approach in light of the above. signed,Rosguill talk 23:03, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


 * ありがとうございます、ロスギル先生.  TheTechnician27   (Talk page)  23:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * どういたしまして. signed,Rosguill talk 23:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, I am the creator of these articles and not a fan of the games (or affiliated with the publisher). I saw the list of red links and researched them, creating base articles I figured I/others could improve upon. I was careful to use legitimate sources like Famitsu and Dengeki Online and avoided fan blogs. While I agree that many of the games are not overly notable, I do not think deletion is the answer - someone may very well be interested in this data, so perhaps a consolidation into one article like "List of D3 Publisher Otome Games" with the data stored in a table for the less covered titles would suffice? At any rate, I think I can manage at least the level of content on that math game article for many of them if I go back through the sources. I'm not sure why listing a subject's blood type (as is standard introduction material in Japan) is a problem, it had been translated as-is from the Japanese wiki article and is now sourced.Londonbeat41692 (talk) 04:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Patrolling
Hi Rosguill, just in case you're getting tired of patrolling my numerous redirects (thank you very much BTW!), my request for the autopatrolled status has been open for a while :). 凰兰时罗 (talk) 16:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , ha, I actually help operate a whitelist specially for automating redirect patrols and am pretty proactive about adding editors there. Nevertheless, your article contributions look stellar, so I've gone ahead and conferred the permission. signed,Rosguill talk 16:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you :) 凰兰时罗 (talk) 16:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Resuming NPP
Hi Rosguill, I was not keeping well, I lost a few of my family members to COVID-19, and then I underwent a severe depression episode, now I am starting to feel better, and would like to continue my schooling with you, am I allowed to continue or do I have to start from the beginning? Thank you! QuantumRealm (meow • telescope) 20:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm glad to hear that you're feeling better. Feel free to pick up where you left off. signed,Rosguill talk 23:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Nicole Rodrigues
Was curious, what brought this onto your radar? I agree it's most likely COI, perhaps even UPE (maybe by some folks who work for her), but it's been around 5 years. I'd draftify it, but there's definitely enough coverage out there to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I came across working on a different article (Elijah Long, now a redirect) that seemed like UPE so I went through their other contributions. signed,Rosguill talk 17:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , cool. Was just wondering.  Seemed out of the blue. And of course, keep up the excellent work.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , heh, I've been slacking off and mostly just doing redirects until yesterday. But thanks regardless, keep up the good work yourself. signed,Rosguill talk 17:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer
Can you give new page reviewer rights to CommanderWaterford because he has done a good job, I have seen his contribution. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 08:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I recently declined a request by them, and other editors objected to them being granted permissions as well while that request was open. While I think that they will likely be able to receive permissions eventually, now is not the time and I'm not sure why you're being so persistent about this. signed,Rosguill talk 17:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It’s the persistence for me and acting as a fiduciary that I don’t just get & I’m almost even compelled to open an SPI. Celestina007 (talk) 00:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Kindly review my request
I applied for autopatrolled rights about a month ago and has not reviewed yet. I have already created 52 articles so far. Please kindly review my request so that if Im not eligible, I can do the necessary steps to gain the right in future. Regards Kichu🐘 Discuss 13:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I generally only review autopatrol requests related to redirect creation. signed,Rosguill talk 15:43, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Bachelor of Homeopathic Medicine and Surgery

 * Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Bachelor of Homeopathic Medicine and Surgery. Thank you. Guy Macon (talk) 15:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Holy shit
When this edit of yours showed up on my watchlist, I had to read the edit summary several times to figure out that it wasn't your summary of what went down. "My, Rosguill is being uncharacteristically salty today!" Bishonen &#124; tålk 19:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC).
 * , I had a similar issue with all of the editors commenting on the discussion about Fuck her right in the pussy. signed,Rosguill talk 19:15, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Lols from the nominator! I did not have the time to look at the results of my XfDs for the previous month yet. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Permyaks
ru:Коми-пермяки 37.122.102.220 (talk) 20:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * читайте Talk:Komi-Permyaks пожалуйсто. signed,Rosguill talk 20:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * пожалуйста. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

God in Islam
I don't know if it's too early for semi-protection, but it's not good. 199.80.13.48 (talk) 17:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * And 2601:2C7:400:34C:7083:F898:38DE:3563 certainly needs a block. Thanks! 199.80.13.48 (talk) 17:48, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I'll keep an eye on the situation, the recent edits are concerning, but given that the IP hasn't edited since the last revert I'll hold off on blocking just yet. signed,Rosguill talk 18:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Rt Rana
dear Rosguill, iam not a paid editor but  iam fan of rt rana's radio program as well as that is my first article so that  iam interested that article and  you can see after moved to article main space i did not do any editing. only wrote a talk page Rajuiu (talk) 00:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , please respond at your own talk page in the future. I will continue the discussion there. signed,Rosguill talk 00:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

LoveKhan69
Hey, I saw you were reviewing the block referenced above but wanted to note that it is more than just an accidental "forgot to disclose" paid editing schtick, they presented themselves as an experienced editor who understands policy to their clients and though I can't link or disclose it on-wiki, this was not an innocent mistake, so I hope that is taken into consideration in this case. CUPIDICAE💕 18:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , that is concerning, can you send me the info by email? signed,Rosguill talk 18:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll forward it to you. CUPIDICAE💕  19:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * , no need to thank me, it seems you've more than earned your perms. signed,Rosguill talk 23:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Untitled
Why you deleted all article of Maharaj Atithi and redirected to kusha ramayana please kindly tell me the reason. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 07:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I explained in my edit summary, you need to provide secondary sources that discuss the subject in detail in order to meet notability guidelines. As it was, the provided sources only had mere mentions of Atithi, not significant coverage. signed,Rosguill talk 16:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Ok thank you to me reason Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 02:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators'_noticeboard
Just wanted to say that I'm always pleased when someone uses singular they as if it's the most normal thing in the world--which it is. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 01:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , pretty sure I've been using it consistently for my entire editing career, but appreciated nonetheless. signed,Rosguill talk 01:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Estefanía Soto
Looks like Estefanía Soto should probably be re-redirected and protected? Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 16:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , if you think that protection is necessary, you should mention that in your comment at the AfD. signed,Rosguill talk 17:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Guy you blocked doing the same thing yet again
He was blocked for edit warring in some text into a section of an article, and now that the block expired, did it again. Seems to be a simple purpose account. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dwilliamphilip83  D r e a m Focus  21:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Rosguill. I was going to post something about this as well after seeing Special:diff/Dwilliamphilip83/1012706667 and then finding Talk:Wonder Woman 1984. It doesn't seem that this editor has learned anything from their block and has decided that continuing with WP:USTHEM and WP:BATTLEGROUND is a better course of action than continuing discussion at Talk:Wonder Woman 1984. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Just for reference, I removed the disputed content and left a note about this on the editor's user talk page (right below the block notice you left). Hopefully, they will now decide to use the article talk page to resolve this. If they revert again, I won't re-revert; however, I think their doing such a thing would be a clear indication that they're unwilling to WP:LISTEN and are going to continue to try and WP:WIN. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I re-blocked for another two weeks, although they should be able to still edit the talk page as it is a partial block. Hopefully that's enough to get the message across. signed,Rosguill talk 23:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Understand and have no problem with that. I've left another post explaining some things on their user talk page, but the proverbially ball truly is now really in their own court and what they decide to do next will probably indicate whether they want to be WP:HERE or whether they continue to want to try and WP:WIN. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * After pointed out that his edits appeared, at least in part, to be self promotional, I'm not as confident they're here to improve the encyclopedia. Two weeks should be enough time for them to get the hint, but if they resume again I'd suspect they're WP:NOTHERE. —Locke Cole • t • c 00:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * They've now been fully blocked for a week by . The best that anyone can do is try to follow WP:BITE and explain things as politely as we can, but at some point the other editor needs to make an effort to (at least pretend) to WP:LISTEN. Three administrators (Masem, Rosguill and Drmies) are now probably watching to see what this person does next and also watching the article to make sure there's no further disruption; so, there's probably not much more that can be done here other than to leave it up to them to deal with if it starts up again. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I blocked indefinitely after the editor continued to complain about a smear campaign waged by a couple of people, which I think means you, Rosguill, and ... well, it doesn't matter. Drmies (talk) 01:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Can you review my request
Hello, I would be grateful if you have a look at my application for the new page reviewer rights. I have already reviewed more than 110 drafts submitted via AFC. (Cleared complete backlog of old submissions related to Wikiproject India and cleared half of the backlog in Wikiproject football). Now I want to reduce the backlog here. Im also well experienced in participating AFD discussions because I took plenty of time learning about our notability guidelnes. Kindly have a look at my submission and tell your opinion, so that in case I got rejected, I can make necessary improvements to get the right in future. Regards. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 06:58, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Sajan Mani
Saw your message being marked as unreviewed. May I know why? Kichu🐘 Need any help? 17:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , the article has several hallmarks of paid editing. While it's possible that the subject may be notable and that accepting it to mainspace was thus the correct move, I think it needs a second look from a new page reviewer. signed,Rosguill talk 17:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


 * , please correct me if Im wrong. There are no issues with notability. I checked all the sources and he has been covered in depth in several reputed sources like The Hindu as well as in some other reputed local newspapers. Yes, there is high probability it might have been created for an undisclosed payment. But if the article is fine in all aspects and has a chance of survival in AFD, any reviewer can accept it right.? There were no other issues like, neutrality, copyright violation or puffery. Thats why I accepted it. Regards Kichu🐘 Need any help? 17:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I wouldn't describe an article that has been WP:REFBOMBED and reads like a promotional CV as fine in all aspects. signed,Rosguill talk 21:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , like you said it may be due to my inexperience in AFC. I will reapply for NPR right after gaining some experience. Regards Kichu🐘 Need any help? 03:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Adopting
Hello,

I have been inactive for three months and would like to train under you. I took time off to reflect as I was way too overconfident and involved in places where I shouldn't have been. I would love to learn under your mentorship and grow as a Wikipedia editor! Thanks,  Mr. Heart  (talk) 04:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , what kind of editing are you interested in doing? signed,Rosguill talk 15:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I am interested in creating articles and editing them to improve them.  Mr. Heart  (talk) 15:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , is there a specific topic that you're interested in? I'm trying to assess whether I would be a good fit to be your mentor. signed,Rosguill talk 15:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , no, I am really versatile.  Mr. Heart  (talk) 15:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , well, then are there any specific parts of article creation that you feel you need guidance on? signed,Rosguill talk 16:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , the content of the article. I usually deal with vandalism and would like to expand in creating articles.  Mr. Heart  (talk) 16:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm not sure there's much I can offer as a mentor at this time. While I'm quite familiar with article creation guidelines and such, I'm don't know that there's anything that you need me to tell you that you couldn't learn from reading through WP:YFA and related help pages. signed,Rosguill talk 18:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Maharaja Atithi is in deletion
Hello, you have  started the discussion on deletion of Maharaja Atithi  I have  to remind you  I have  left message in that discussion. Please see that when you get the time. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 06:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Harari people
Hi, can you chime in here, User:Ayaltimo is removing content that was on the page for atleast 2 years and requesting consensus by reverting. This user doesn't undertstand the BRD process Magherbin (talk) 21:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Reviewing some articles
Hi, could you perhaps review Draft:Gamora (Marvel Cinematic Universe) and Draft:Peter Quill (Marvel Cinematic Universe)? They’re not my articles btw, they have been created by a fair few users, about relatively notable characters. Thanks. IronManCap (talk) 18:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , sorry, I don't review articles on request. signed,Rosguill talk 22:59, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Ok, that’s fine. IronManCap (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Long NPP rights wait
Hi Rosguill,

I don't mean to be a bother, but I recently reapplied for NPP permissions and at this point it has been at least a week. This also happened when I requested them for the first time around. I assumed that you or someone else were checking my contributions, but the weeklong turnaround seems excessive, and makes me feel weird seeing that others who posted after me have been approved or rejected. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 18:13, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , sorry for the wait. I can explain my decision to skip over you earlier, which is that I usually avoid reviewing the re-application of editors whose trial runs I granted. If no one has reviewed your request by the end of the week I'll take care of it. signed,Rosguill talk 18:31, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi again Rosguill (I'm using this instead of making a new thread), and thanks for extending the NPP right. I saw you noted a couple articles with potentially unreliable sources but I might have only been watching one. Could you specify the others, by chance? I'm also grateful for any other feedback you might be willing to offer to become a more efficient patroller. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 23:38, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , the ones I'm thinking of are Mahmud Shakir and Jordan Fein, the latter of which I've nominated for AfD. Those and quite a few other BLPs you reviewed had pretty clear signs of COI (sometimes declared), although for three or four of them I dug through the pile of sources and did eventually find enough to meet WP:GNG, so in the end you made the right call most of the time. If you're aware of the warning signs and also dug through the sources on articles like Michael Kagan (artist) and Matt Amato before deciding to accept them, then I think you're doing fine. signed,Rosguill talk 23:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Points well-taken. I know at least on a couple of them, I was working off of my understanding of some content-related SNGs (with Fein and Kagan at least), but maybe I need to review those SNGs more closely. I appreciate the feedback.
 * , For Fein, the article puffed up some accomplishments that I think themselves fall short of meeting notability and thus don't contribute toward meeting the SNG. For Kagan, IIRC I think I came to the conclusion that he does meet the SNG, but figuring out whether a given exhibition or gallery should contribute to the guideline is quite difficult and this article was on the borderline.signed,Rosguill talk 00:04, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

You blew my mind with that AfD
I have never swung so hard between being sure someone was notable, and being sure someone was actually two someones, to having no idea at all if Jordan Fein is just a cat in a box that isn't being observed and I will never know if he's a film director or a theater director or both. Some sources seem to refer to him as the same person, but the two websites which feature pictures of someone who could easily be the same person, show completely separated fields of art. I just wanted you to know that you managed to confuse and bewilder me without even having to address me in particular. Have a great day! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:15, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , yeah, I had to think about it for a good long while too, but the theater accomplishments of the other Jordan Fein were simply too significant for it to make sense that they weren't included in the existing article revision. There's an essay about cases like this, WP:FRANKENSTEIN. signed,Rosguill talk 15:24, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * That's a good essay. I think this example is probably a bit beyond most of the examples there, however. They both look the same, around the same age, attended the same school and work in fields that generally have overlap anyway. Also with the bard.edu page combining the two of them it threw me for a loop. I was going to keep looking at AfDs, but I think that did me in for the day. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

FYI about an editor adding unsourced info, with no edit summary
Hi - I saw that you just blocked Ageringpoker, and thought I'd run this by you as well. A relatively new editor (January 2021) has been adding info without sourcing or edit summaries. He's been asked politely multiple times, including by me. I had to go and clean up some of his damage. I added this comment to his (her?) talk page User_talk:Guillermo_Alonso_Martínez_Espinoza. You can see others have also asked him to not add unsourced info, and many of his contributions have been reverted. The only response I've seen from him was a flippant reply to another editor (Dormskirk), who just cleaned up subsequent sloppy edits []. At least he used a source this time, but still no edit summary. This reminds me of the Yoodaba sock farm where the editors made edits to articles in a single industry, probably to create a history of being involved in that space. Or you can look at the acronym of his name (GAME) and assume WP:NOTHERE. Perhaps you might have more luck getting a response with a 24 hour block. <b style="color:#7F007F">TimTempleton</b> <sup style="color:#800080">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  01:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I've gone ahead and blocked them, they made additional unsourced changes at another article since your warning. signed,Rosguill talk 01:48, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi - he's at it again. I think he's trying to insert links to macrotrends.com as financial refs to promote the site.  He's sloppily introducing template errors that he has to fix, and isn't leaving edit summaries.  I asked him again on his talk page to leave edit summaries and he never responded. WP:RADAR and WP:NOTHERE <b style="color:#7F007F">TimTempleton</b> <sup style="color:#800080">(talk)  <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  18:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , at this point I think you should open an ANI or COIN discussion to investigate the macrotrends spam. signed,Rosguill talk 20:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * That's what I'll do then. Cheers. <b style="color:#7F007F">TimTempleton</b> <sup style="color:#800080">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  01:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Kurayami no Hate de Kimi wo Matsu
Hello! I am curious as to why you felt this article did not meet criteria. The citations included two professional reviews as well as a news article confirming a sales record - is that not enough to establish notability? I understand that other editors who cannot read Japanese were accusing me of using fan blogs (and others claimed that the professional magazine B's Log, which is run by Kadokawa with an editorial department easily accessible from the bottom of the main page lacked editoral oversight), but that is not the case. Londonbeat41692 (talk) 01:12, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I reviewed the redirect, not the article. My assessment that the redirect is valid is no comment on the decision to remove the article, as I have not reviewed it. You should take this up with . signed,Rosguill talk 01:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrolled permissions
Hi. Don't misunderstand me. You changed my autopatrolled rights by citing that too many deleted articles recently. But actually I saw only three articles have been deleted recently. Earlier some of my cricket centurion articles and 5-wicket haul articles were deleted. Out of my 4,295 articles, only 168 articles have been deleted. Also, I have created many notable articles in zoology, botany, cricket and cinema. So, I am bit confused about your revert. Thank You. Have a nice day. Gihan Jayaweera (talk) 21:09, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , autopatrol is reserved for editors whose new article contributions are near flawless. Even a low deletion rate can be disqualifying for that permission. Moreover, even articles that don't end up deleted may benefit from further review if there are sourcing or neutrality issues. signed,Rosguill talk 17:17, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Orthodox Christians
When you retargetted to the DAB page Orthodox, you may have overlooked WP:FIXDABLINKS. The change broke over 1,800 links, which will have to be fixed by hand. You might like to invite the retarget !voters in the RFD to help. Narky Blert (talk) 09:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the note, pinging participants in that RfD, , , . I'll put some work into this myself as well later today. signed,Rosguill talk 16:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I tried to fix a link using the tool you linked, and it told me: "A problem occurred in a Python script. Here is the sequence of function calls leading up to the error, in the order they occurred." Veverve (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , yeah, the script isn't working for doing the fixes, I've been using it to just list the pages that need edits. Most of the way through the A's now and will be working on this for at least another hour, so if you want to work on it now I would recommend starting from the bottom of the alphabet. signed,Rosguill talk 17:53, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * just noting that I'm taking a break for now, made it down to the L's on the list. signed,Rosguill talk 19:06, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The DPwL link is working ok for me. Just pick off the low-hanging-fruit - entries which haven't been struck through. DPwL refreshes every 12 hours.
 * This was a change which definitely needed to be made. Unlike some moves/redirects, it's unlikely to throw up many real horrors; but still. If you're not immediately sure about a link, just leave it. In big changes like these (I remember vinyl, which IIRC broke over 3,000 links), every bit of effort helps. Narky Blert (talk) 20:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Wow, you really have been busy solving this! Thanks for pinging me, I've done a few, but thumbs up for all your work! Daranios (talk) 07:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Bania (caste)
Hi, it is regarding this protection. After the protection expired, IPs and a user (who had been adding unsourced content) started again. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I extended protection for 3 months and notified the registered user about IPA discretionary sanctions. signed,Rosguill talk 15:06, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks a bunch . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Looks like the article needs extended protected like you did last time. The user (non EC) wouldn't stop from adding unsourced content and mentioning unreliable sources in the edit summaries . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

NPP
Hi. I hope all is well with you. I think I need to take a break from NPP. Whilst the majority of article creators take tagging their articles well, I'm finding it more and more difficult to be civil and objective when replying to those who take it as if it was a personal insult. Last night I got told how I should be doing things by a recently created patroller at Talk:Allan Day, after writing a long reply that would probably have warranted a block, I checked myself and deleted it before pressing publish. Hopefully a short break will enable me to "refresh the batteries" and cope with the more difficult aspects a little better. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm sorry to hear that, but it seems like a reasonable decision on your part. Hope you feel up to jumping back into the queue soon enough. signed,Rosguill talk 16:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
 * Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

Technical news
 * When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem.
 * Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers.

Arbitration
 * A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)