User talk:Rosh1627/sandboxMM

update?
Not sure what the status of your article is. Profhanley (talk)

:D
Tbh could REALLY use some more info from this page. This is a pretty good start but if you want to reach good article status, you're going to have to put in a lot more work. Also you seem confused about how to properly format your article. Overall though not a bad topic and not a bad start.

Peer Review- Danae S.
1) First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? I like how you included the other works of writing this author was involved in since the novel seems to lean heavily on the genre it originates in. Quick note, the british TV show you referenced is actually called "Midsomer" Murders (a great show). I think the use of themes you chose is very interesting to citing the plot in a critical way. '''2) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?''' The sections are good but need elaboration. There should not be anything wrong with at least including a character list for the novel as other wikipedia articles do so. Instead of a summary section you could include a recap of the plot, particularily if there are any quotes that reference the themes you mention or allude to some of the author's other works (Sherlock Holmes, etc.) 3) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? This article could use more clear formatting and developed sections. Including a synopsis of the novel as well as 1-2 more sources may be necessary. '''4) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!''' The themes section which seems to insinuate as sort of meta-critique is something I am considering citing in my own article as the author I am discussing, like yours, seems to be self-aware of the medium he operates in.