User talk:Rossco6876

Nonsense of Tangy tom
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Tangy tom, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Tangy tom provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Tangy tom, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 12:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but I've deleted this as meeting WP:CSD. You may want to carefully review Your first article.
 * For more general information about the deletion process, please see User:Dlohcierekim/deletion
 * If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.
 * If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:/test.
 * Cheers, and happy editing.  Dloh  cierekim  14:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Mysdaao talk 13:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Tangy tom
Hello. This was totally incomprehensible. It did not identify the subject and made no assertions of meeting our guideline for notability, WP:N. There was nothing salvageable in it, and it would need to be completely rewritten to be encyclopedic. In writing the article, consider answering the standard questions of composition-- who? what? why? where? when? how? I suggest that you read the manual of style. An article will require reliable sources with verifiable information. I will move the deleted content to your user space at User:Rossco6876/Tangy tom to work on. I'll check back from time to time to see what progress has been made. Be warned, another admin may see it and decide to redelete it if there is no progress toward writing an article. When it is ready, we can move it back to the article space. Cheers, 14:27, 29 January 2009 (UTC)