User talk:Rossdanielbarrie/sandbox

Peer Review
Starts off great. Uses clear and relevant statistics. Could improve by citing sources as you go. Clearly relates to your topic and country. Bwiffen1234 (talk) 22:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Ruben's peer review
Overall good work, keep it going like this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RubenGer (talk • contribs) 23:12, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Really good structure, as good as a paragraph from an advanced editor
 * Every point is structured out well but not too detailed
 * Due to numbers and neutral way of writing really informal
 * Sources are all reliable