User talk:Rossmcmeekin

Speedy deletion of The Old Shack Review
A tag has been placed on The Old Shack Review requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 17:47, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

((hangon)) - They are a legitimate publication that reviews legitimate albums by legitimate artists - please check the website for verification.
 * Please add the template on the article page, immediately below the speedy deletion template, and add your comment to the the article's talk page. As it stands, the article fails to indicate the notability of the subject matter per WP:N. – ukexpat (talk) 18:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Old Shack Reviews links
Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

I've noticed that this account has been used solely to insert links to Old Shack Reviews. Single-purpose accounts for spam/advertising links is not permitted on Wikipedia. If your site is notable, then links to the site will be naturally added by multiple editors - not solely from one account. --Madchester (talk) 02:00, 21 June 2008 (UTC)