User talk:Rossrs/archive4

Happy New Year
(Feliz Año Nuevo)



I wish you and your loved ones all the happiness in the world this coming year.

Cheetah Girls
It was either in M Magzine or Bop Magazine. I can't remember which one. It was also in Blast Magazine but these are al small teen magazines and they don't have anything online about it. It's in Blast! Magazine for sure, because I have it, but I have no way to upload it onto the computer. It was also annoced by Adrienne Bailon in the October issue of Disney Adventures. Jtervin 08:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, I'll send it to you as soon as possible. Jtervin 08:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Title: Blast Presents: Catching up with the cast of High School Musical & other teen TV stars Date given on issue: Spring 2007>br> Page: 38 Author: None given
 * The source information is as follows:

There you go! Jtervin 00:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Of Human Bondage image
Hi, so why did you send me in the first place if you were going to replace the screenshot with a PD image? Best wishes, &lt;KF&gt; 20:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Hello
Why, thank you sir, for those kind words! It's good to be back (ish) and I really like what you've done with the place. I kinda dropped out of view when becoming involved with the organization of Quakecon (the event, not the article) some time ago, but intend to resume some wikitasks here and there. My main Wiki pipe dream would be the FA-isation of the Sarah McLachlan article, which is in real need of some major overhaul and restructuring (the article, not the artist). We'll see. In any case, feel free to contact me if you need some help with one of your editing endeavours! Cheers, --Plek 18:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, I'm sure it must take some courage to share the stage with Björn Again... Let's file my unfortunate edit under Unintended consequences. :-) --Plek 20:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Kylie Minogue category cleanup

 * (cross-posted to User talk:Underneath-it-All)

Greetings! I'm trying to de-spamify the long list of category tags in the Kylie Minogue article. I've created a section on the talk page to discuss things: Talk:Kylie Minogue. I'd appreciate your views on this monumental task. Thanks! --Plek 16:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Dorothy Malone
Hello! I see you added an infobox to this article. I would appreciate your explaining why you feel an infobox that simply reiterates facts already in the article is necessary. I realize they unfortunmately have become commonplace, but personally I don't understand their purpose. If Wikipedia is to be considered an encyclopedia, how does an infobox fit in with that concept? Thanks for your input! SFTVLGUY2 16:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Infoboxes
Had I been active in Wikipedia at the time the infoboxes were nominated for deletion, I definitely would have voted against them. Are you familiar with USA Today? It's a newspaper designed for those on the run, people too busy to read in-depth coverage of news events. It's filled with blurbs and colorful charts and graphics designed for those who want to know everything at a mere glance. That is exactly how I view the infobox. I agree with everything you said re: consistency. . . it's just too bad the infobox is considered an acceptable part of Wiki format.

I'm a big contributor of articles about plays and musicals. I can't begin to tell you how much those differ in style. Slowly but surely I'm trying to re-write them to conform to the way I feel they should be written. So far, nobody has objected!

Thanks for your detailed and intelligent response. I appreciate your taking the time to write. SFTVLGUY2 17:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Confessions Tour....
Hey there. Long time no chat. Could u please pop by and add ur two cents into the 'Confessions Tour' controversy? Thanks! PatrickJ83 00:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you treasure. In addition I re-wrote it in a similar fashion to Kylie article mention on her tour. PatrickJ83 02:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Danni Minogue samples
Sir! I've posted a message at User talk:Underneath-it-All about my work-in-progress to add some song samples to the Dannii Minogue article. As you've gone through all that on its "sister article" (geddit? heheheh... ahem), maybe you could add your two cents to some of my comments there. If it isn't too much trouble, of course. Cheers! --Plek 22:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments! I have just finished uploading and documenting the bunch, and the result can be admired/mocked here: Talk:Dannii Minogue. I think I'll leave it to the capable hands of my fellow Wikipedians to insert the boxes into the article. And yes, one or two extra "early" songs would probably be a good idea. Let's see if any special requests come in.
 * I have cobbled together a fair-use clause, using yours and those of others as examples. I think the result is decent enough to pass muster. It might even satisfy the MAFIAA (although, given their modus operandi, some bribes might prove more effective in keeping them at bay :). --Plek 22:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * ...and now "This Is It" has been added as well. Oh, the Humanity! --Plek 22:34, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:MCHammerPleaseHammerDontHurtThemAlbumcover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:MCHammerPleaseHammerDontHurtThemAlbumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:54, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Madonna picture...
I've uploaded a new picture that isn't butt ugly to the Madge article like the "performing" picture was. This is, to me, a FAIR USE promotional image like the images we've used in the Jean Harlow article. If this is not ok, can we please find an attractive image of her? What are papparazi for anyway? To take pictures that are usable by no one? PatrickJ83 23:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Timothy Hutton
hiya - I came across your comment somewhere about wanting some uniformity in infoboxes for Oscar winners. Timothy Hutton had none, so I added one that I think is correct, but could you have a look? Thanks - hope all's well. Tvoz | talk 08:38, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * thanks - yes, things are good! Tvoz | talk 00:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Palm Island ACOTF
Hi Rossrs, I notice you made an good analysis of the Palm Island article here last year, I was wondering if you had any further comments in light of all the activity there at the moment due to it being the current Collaboration of the Fortnight. Due to your experience of bringing articles up to feature status, your opinions are of huge interest to me as that is supposed to be objective of ACOTF. Any input you can add at the open tasks list would be much appreciated as we only have a week left. Thanks, WikiTownsvillian 14:47, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:KylieMinoguewithStockAitkenWaterman.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:KylieMinoguewithStockAitkenWaterman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:Films Newsletter
The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 06:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Boney M.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Boney M.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: 3RR question
When that happens, WP:BLP is right behind us: "Unsourced or poorly sourced controversial (negative, positive, or just highly questionable) material about living persons should be removed immediately from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, and user pages." :) RadioKirk (u|t|c)  14:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Um... well... yeah, there is that... *cough*estates*cough* :D RadioKirk (u|t|c)  22:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Seriously, though, I think WP:V has all we need. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c)  22:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:MattDamonJuliaStilesBourneSupremacy.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:MattDamonJuliaStilesBourneSupremacy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Thank you
Welcome to the Twilight Zone indeed! :) In any case, and in the interest of WP:AGF, you might want to take a look at and . Both edits got wiped out by my anti-discussion-blanking revert. It looks like the anonymous IP editor tried to make constructive changes to the article&mdash;but did so on the talk page. Maybe you can make something out of it. Have a nice day/night! --Plek 07:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Notability of User218.217.208.98
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as User218.217.208.98) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Turlo Lomon 08:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

And now the non-template response. It appears you created an article when you meant to update a user page. Turlo Lomon 08:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm in the process of listing a bunch of IPs as sock puppets. Is this wrong?  I'm following the directions and examples on the sock puppet page.  Am I not supposed to be tagging each page?  thanks Rossrs 09:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * You need to read the second part of my message. You made an error on one of the ones you did. It created a regular article instead of a user page. Turlo Lomon 09:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Be sure to include a colon after "User". Omitting it was the mistake. Flyingtoaster1337 09:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Your stalker
I would wait him out... sooner or later it will stop. Hopefully. Flyingtoaster1337 09:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

If they are being really persistently annoying, drop a word to the admins' incident noticeboard and ask them to decide whether anybody warrants blocking. There isn't any need for a sockpuppet check if they're all doing roughly the same thing - their behaviour alone will nail them. Flyingtoaster1337 13:15, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I got your message; feel free to use my edits as evidence in any way you like. By the way, querying WHOIS for the IP addresses in your suspected sock list leads to JPNIC, and shows that they are all on the same network:

Network Information: a. [Network Number]            219.104.0.0/16 b. [Network Name]              INFOWEB g. [Organization]              InfoWeb(Fujitsu Ltd.) m. [Administrative Contact]    YK13517JP n. [Technical Contact]         KN6902JP n. [Technical Contact]         TK13654JP p. [Nameserver]                ns1.hyper.web.ad.jp p. [Nameserver]                 ns3.hyper.web.ad.jp [Assigned Date]                 2002/06/12 [Return Date] [Last Update]                  2006/03/07 04:14:14(JST) Less Specific Info. -- FUJITSU LIMITED [Allocation]                              219.104.0.0/16 ...and the same contact info for network 218.217.0.0/16. Might be useful information somehow. Please let me know if there's anything I can do. Good luck! --Plek 18:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh, and this insignificant tidbit might be of help: -> . :-) --Plek 22:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Infobox rationales
Hi there, I thought you might be interesting in commenting on the latest points at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biography. Kind regards, Ekantik talk 02:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Madonna
I'd just like to thank you for your constructive and reasoned feedback on my post. I was unaware of the guideline for lead edits and can now become a better editor because of it. /cheer fritte 14:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Toomuchtrivia tags
Many of the tags were added to pages that had only three or four trivia notes. I'm sorry I did not have the time to look over and review each one individually, but I believed, as I was right, that other editors such as yourselves would reinstate if the tag did indeed make sense. However, when this ip address had more than a hundred edits all with the same tag, and all within a couple of minutes of each other, how can it be anything but disruptive. I'm not saying they were all out of place, but a good number were.TheGreenFaerae 23:36, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:DianaDors.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DianaDors.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Need people with an opinion
Hey there. I noticed that in the past, you have participated in a discussion about Filmoraphies and lists of works in general here. There is now a RfC discussing this and more aspects here. It would be nice if you took a look and gave your comments on those matters. Thank you. theroachmanTC 10:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:AStarisBorn1954.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:AStarisBorn1954.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

From Claudette To Vivien
That's great news! What fun. Nothing I like better than rewriting gibberish into English. But seriously though. My suggestion would be to let our Osaka cinephile write himself out, do all his edits for as long as he likes and when he has nothing more to add (hopefully), then do 1 big revert, rather than keep reverting every addition, because that only seems to provoke him to more depths of triviality. That's what I'd do.

All the best Orbicle 21:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

James Dean
Thank you for your third party statement on the Talk:James Dean page. I have now deleted the entire sexuality section and rewritten the relationships section. Perhaps you may have a look at it. See and James_Dean. I hope other users will improve the quality of the other sections. Onefortyone 18:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Instead of improving the article, the sockpuppet of another user has only deleted what I have written. See and . Perhaps you may also keep a watchful eye on the James Dean article. Thanks. Onefortyone 23:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films February Newsletter
The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 23:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Gibson's infobox
Haha thanks Rossrs for changing the colour, I hated it :) Gwen Gale 22:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Intersection by location
Hi. I wanted to point out to you a new overcategorization guideline. It calls into question the appropriateness of a category that you created, Category:Quebec actors. Before taking this and similar categories to Cfd, I thought I would check in with you first. --Vbd (talk) 21:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

KM talk page vandal
Hi Ross! You might be interested to know that I've re-reported the behaviour of rhe Kylie Minogue talk page vandal here: WP:AN/I. Let's hope that the admins take some action this second time around. Cheers. --Plek 21:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Jake Gylenhaal photo
Hey, I was wondering if you could send the permission you have from the creator of the photo to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and include the following link in the e-mail:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:JakeGyllenhaalcropped.jpg

Otherwise the photo may have to be deleted. Thanks, Yonatan (contribs/talk) 00:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I've forwarded the email to them (I've largely changed email addresses, so *that* was fun finding it). Btw, there's another free image of Jake here. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 08:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks, both of you. There's a bit of backlog right now I think so it may take a few days. Yonatan (contribs/talk) 08:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Text
Right, but we can't add text, then source it to a Wikimirror. That is essentially the same thing as using Wikipedia to source itself and that is not sufficient to verify text. I probably should have clarified that on the talkpage...--Isotope23 12:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Reply
I know what you mean... sifting thorough 20 changes to discern the changes that are actually valid is getting to be a bit of a pain.--Isotope23 00:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Refs and paragraphs
Regarding this edit: I've been using refs sparingly, including at the end of its necessity even if there are separate paragraphs between the start and end of a section using the one source (the reason: I think using the same source in successive paragraphs is as redundant as in successive sentences). Have I been wrong all this time? RadioKirk (u|t|c)  01:42, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, sounds good to me, I guess... ;) RadioKirk (u|t|c)  04:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Help with image usage
You are obviously an experienced Wikipedian. Could you explain your reverting the photos I uploaded for Grace Kelly? I am not familiar with the rules for licensing, etc., but I do believe the photos I used were more appropriate for the article. Thanks for your help. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ermorse (talk • contribs) 03:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC).

Thank you for your explanation of the image use. You're certainly an asset to this great experiment--keep up the good work! Ermorse 23:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Infoboxes
Okie dokie! Got it! And you have keen observation, you caught me putting infoboxes. Is that bad? I think not at all. I just want all the actors' articles to have infoboxes (What do you think?). :) Ok, I'll fixed the other articles that I've made. Thanks for correcting me and now I'll always put in my mind birth and age template only for living... ok... thanks! Hedwig0407 (talk) 14:41, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that what I mean, consistency to all people's articles. As of now, Im just doing female actors and after that I'll do male actors then to authors. Thank you :) Hedwig0407 (talk) 01:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Discussion?
Given your participation in the Nicole Kidman debate, I thought you might be interested in the discussion I started at Wikipedia Talk:Overcategorization. --Vbd (talk) 14:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

March WP:FILMS Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by Cbrown1023 <b style="color:#002bb8; font-size:smaller;">talk</b> 00:43, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Blondie (band)
Hey, thanks for catching that vandalism edit to Blondie. If you check the article history you'll see I've reverted it a bunch of times in the past for identical reasons: non-existent Grammys, chart position inflations, etc. I've definitely kept the article in my watchlist. User is using several anon IPs of course..... - eo 22:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Wptfe/Nrh15
It seems he has taken an interest in the Charles Boyer article in the last couple days. --PhantomS 06:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Eve
Yes i didn't notice till after i made my mistake - i was looking at AIDS activists where Ryan White was listed. PMA 01:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Kim Possible images should be kept
I noticed that you tagged the following images related to Kim Possible episodes for deletion;


 * Image:CarTrouble.jpg
 * Image:TheGoldenYears.jpg
 * Image:JobUnfair.jpg
 * Image:VirTuRon.jpg
 * Image:TheFearlessFerret.jpg
 * Image:Exchange.jpg

All those images have tv-screenshot tags, therefore they're needed for each episode. The one you put up for deletion for "Exchange" was for the infobox, until it was replaced with a duplicate. DanTD 15:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * no, I didn't tag them for deletion. I tagged them as missing source information needed to justify fair use and notified the uploader who then added the necessary information.  This was in April 2006.  They have since been listed for deletion by another user, so you would need to send a message to that user if you wish to comment.  They are currently tagged - by someone else - as lacking a fair use rationale.   The tag that has been added explains what is required to fix the problem.   Rossrs 21:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay, I've seen the error of my ways. But even though I didn't upload any of them, I stand by the title of my message. DanTD 00:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay, and I don't disagree with you, but I'm not the person you need to speak to. Rossrs 09:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Madonna....
hi Rossrs! How are you? Havent talked to u in a while...

I deleted the 'political views' and 'diet and exercise' sections from the Madonna page. I 'discussed' why as well. Care to opine? LOL....thanks! PatrickJ83 22:32, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Claudette Colbert
I'm not very knowledgeable about this subject, but it sure appears to me that our sockpuppeting friend there is engaging in tendentious editing. I'd fully support you boldly going back to whatever version from the past you feel is more appropriate. At this point I'm getting very close to initiating a ban discussion about him because at this is pretty much a single purpose account and because of the ISP he uses, blocking is only a stop gap.--Isotope23 12:38, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Not all that odd given the fact he has stated he is Japanese with a few of his past accounts and that IP is a Japanese dialup... but right, the problem here is the fact that the editor doesn't want to discuss anything. I'll chalk up some of it to English being his second language, but continuing to add WP:POV, WP:OR, and rejecting any attempt to discuss is a big problem.--Isotope23 13:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Right... I found that pretty amusing too. I agree, there are nuances here that he is missing, but it is his attitude that is the problem here, not English as a secondary language.  We have plenty of ESL contributors here who are very productive participants in the community.  Some of this misunderstandings are probably rooted in language, but the way he approaches article edits and working with others is the reason I started a community ban discussion.  He is making more work for everyone else.--Isotope23 15:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I've found four more accounts of apparently Japanese origin that have been editing numerous Claudette Colbert film articles in a similar way to Wptfe: Svsvtkag, Fjykbgv, JadaDeville, and M.A.Dicker. --PhantomS 03:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

OMG!
You have cable down under? Don't the Dingos chew through the wires?--Isotope23 23:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Kylie Minogue
Hey! I have created a Kylie Minogue WikiProject to help expanded and create articles concerning Minogue. Please feel free to join up. :) -- Underneath-it-All 13:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:AnneFrankDiaryofaYoungGirl1995.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:AnneFrankDiaryofaYoungGirl1995.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Jim Dean's huge fan
Hey, Ross - whaddyamean? - maybe the guy's father weighed 300 pounds! Nice to see you! By the way - I stopped arguing with Binks or whatever his name is over on Bee Gees about keeping the extremely short line about having their major success when they returned to England.... I mean, who cares? I won't be surprised if some English chauvinist changes it, but c'est la vie! Cheers! Tvoz | talk 23:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Valerie's Birth Year
I serve on the Hollywood Board of Directors of Screen Actors Guild with Valerie and have known her for almost a decade. Someone noted her birth year in print as 1940 years ago and she just took it as a fortunate mistake It's 1939. That's as much "verification" as you're gonna get. MrEguy |  &spades;&hearts;&clubs;&diams; 02:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)


 * this was in response to a comment I posted at Talk:Valerie Harper and I have replied there. Rossrs 08:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:ChristinaAguileraalbumcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ChristinaAguileraalbumcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 06:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Metropolis2002DVDcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Metropolis2002DVDcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 07:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject proposal
Hi Ross, there's a current proposal to start up a new WikiProject covering Australian music. See here. I thought you may be interested. Cheers &mdash;Moondyne 12:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and you're welcome. Cheers. &mdash;Moondyne 14:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:LuiseRainer.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:LuiseRainer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 22:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:JimmyBarnesTwoFiresAlbumcover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:JimmyBarnesTwoFiresAlbumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

80s singles
Hi Ross

thanks for your feedback. I wanted to give people the opportunity to contact me first before wiping what people had done before. I understand you put the page together originally?

I have contributed a number of pages in this genre, including these:

List of number-one singles in Australia during the 1960s List of number-one singles in Australia during the 1970s List_of_number-one_albums_in_Australia_during_the_1960s List_of_number-one_albums_in_Australia_during_the_1970s List_of_number-one_albums_in_Australia_during_the_1980s

I got the idea for the layout from looking through what was on offer overseas, and thought the best version was this one, also from Down Under (NZ): List_of_number-one_singles_in_1981_%28NZ%29 I like the fact that visually you get the sense of the passage of time in this format and the idea of which songs were number one for a longer time period visually, rather than just a number in a column of figures representing a number of weeks; although I understand your argument, that it may look cumbersome, or take up a bit more space to do it the "NZ way". I compiled a website on Go-Set charts last year and followed the model you describe there: http://www.poparchives.com.au/gosetcharts/singles.html, although I can't say I'm 100% happy with it, I prefer the layout here on wikipedia.

Another couple of considerations: adding more dates would potentially widen the columns, leaving less room for the display of the images on the right hand side, especially in older browsers/with lower screen resolutions (which would scrunch everything up more). At the Dec/Jan period of each year, there is no need to add: "2 weeks this year and 5 weeks the following year", as it's clear from the table what is going on, as it now stands. This also applies when a song was number one for a few weeks, then something else comes along, then the old one returns to the top again... (eg. Flashdance / Australiana in 1983) it makes it easier to understand this when it's in the "NZ" visual format. I'd really like to leave it as it is please, if you don't mind, as it would mean a lot of work going back through all the pages above and standardising it. Can you live with that ... please? I did not touch the ARIA singles Jun 88+ and left them in the format you composed it in, to distinguish it from the Kent charts.

I don't propose to do the 1990s, as I don't have the ARIA charts or a full set of Kent Music Report charts for the period. I don't propose touching the 2000s material either, which is also ARIA. Will leave it for someone else to fill in the missing 90s albums, it's also not my era of music... I do have singles data from the 1940s & 50s, though.... maybe someday in the future, although that s not my era of music either!

As far as quotes and itals are concerned, that is much easier to fix, as it would be just a matter of find & replace. I noted the NZ site has both itals & quotes. I thought the quotes looked a bit clunky, which is why I decided on itals, not knowing what any standards were. I've made / am making certain that the images used are also on other wikipedia pages as well, so that they shouldn't be removed. I also got the correct "fair usage" wording from wikipedia staff and went through and included it on every single page for each image that i uploaded. So its been a lot of work already, the whole thing!

I'll leave it as is for a week or so in case anyone else wishes to comment. Thanks again for your compliments, regards Barry in Sydney Rusty201 18:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 22:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Freaks.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Freaks.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Australian music
You previously indicated an interest in this at WikiProject Council/Proposals. I've started up a new page but it needs lots of work. Come on over and join up. Regards. &mdash;Moondyne 18:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CelineDionThinkTwice.ogg)
Thanks for uploading Image:CelineDionThinkTwice.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TheThinManDVD.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:TheThinManDVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:DollyPartonTheRiverUnbrokensingle.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DollyPartonTheRiverUnbrokensingle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex  22:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:DollyPartonTheRiverUnbrokensingle.jpg
I have tagged Image:DollyPartonTheRiverUnbrokensingle.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Videmus Omnia 02:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)