User talk:Rostik.

License tagging for Image:Summer parade uniform of Aviation.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Summer parade uniform of Aviation.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 14:09, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Admiral of the Fleet of the Russian Federation
Why are you adding this to the table of rank on Naval ranks and insignia of the Russian Federation, what are your sources for claiming that this rank actualy exist. --DimaY2K 12:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I not claiming that this rank actualy exist.Mark #1 say - at the present time this is not an active rank and only a theoretical (hypothetical) possible military rank of the modern Russian Navy Force that is considered the highest Russian naval position. This rank and insignia for it have been developed by service of rear of the Russian Army and heraldic council at the Ministry of Defence of Russia as possible highest Russian naval position rank and can be used in wartime when the Russian Navy demands it. It has been published in a "Red Star' in 1994. Therefore I am convinced that this rank should be in this article, but with a mark.

--Rostik. 12:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Amiral de la flotte
Please stop adding this claim if you cannot support it with references. As far as I know, this rank is not in use nowadays.

Also, please refrain from uploading images in complete disregard for their copyright. Rama 20:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Dignity of Amiral de France remains theoretical in the Fifth Republic.In present time the rank not in use and not appoint, but existing and it officially nobody cancelled a rank.--Rostik. 11:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * can you source this ?, , , all stop at five-star admiral. marinerecrute.gouv.fr is an official site of the French government. Rama 11:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I would like to bring your attention on the fact that you have been warned about copyright violations. You will be blocked if you further upload material in disregard for its copyright. Rama 11:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 1. Your sources not says, that this rank cancelling and there is no existing. In present time the rank not in use and not appoint,because in your sites you can not find it - all of them says about present time, but I say still existing for Honorary/War time and it officially nobody cancelled a rank. 2. I did not break copyrights, because this picture is not protected by copyright.--Rostik. 11:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The rank might not exist at all if not created. Was there any occurrence of an amiral de France during the Vth Republic ?
 * Yes the image is copyrighted. Read the licence. Rama 12:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * amiral de France full name=Amiral de la flotte de France can be appoint only for Honorary/War time during the Vth Republic and I say still this rank theoreticaly existing in present time too. This is not only a rank, this is a title too, which corresponds moreover to a high position in the state ("Dignité dans l'Etat"). See NATO rank codes http://rankmaven.tripod.com/NATO-92-RM.htm - in Nation : FR.--Rostik. 12:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Show me reputable sources, like official sites. Besides, how do you manage to produce an insignia fro something which does not exist ? Rama 12:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Amiral de la Flotte de France.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Amiral de la Flotte de France.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Block
You are now blocked for 24 hours for repeated copyright violations.

When you come back, you'd be well-advised to source your statements and respect copyright. Thank you in advance. Rama 12:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Admiral_of_the_Fleet_of_the_Russian_Federation_insignia.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Admiral_of_the_Fleet_of_the_Russian_Federation_insignia.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 14:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:26_01-1-.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:26_01-1-.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 14:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:22_01-1-.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:22_01-1-.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 14:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)