User talk:Roter Insulaner

AfC notification: Draft:Research Institutes for Experimental Medicine has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Research Institutes for Experimental Medicine. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research Institutes for Experimental Medicine has been accepted
 Research Institutes for Experimental Medicine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Research_Institutes_for_Experimental_Medicine help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 18:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Gunnar Klack for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gunnar Klack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gunnar Klack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  scope_creep Talk  13:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hi Roter Insulaner! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Gunnar Klack that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Kj! Thanks for the comment. Oh, it really looks like I overused the minor-edit-tag. I was not aware of the specific definition. I promise to use it more carefully. Roter Insulaner (talk) 19:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi there. It's easily done! Just something to be aware of in the future. :) -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:21, 17 August 2022 (UTC)