User talk:Rothwell92

February 2020
Hello, I'm The Mirror Cracked. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Diane Abbott ‎ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 01:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Discrimination against people of a certain race is racism. I am correct. Rothwell92 (talk) 01:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Diane Abbott, you may be blocked from editing. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 01:31, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Diane Abbott. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. — Bilorv ( talk ) 01:42, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

I am using the correct terms stated in the Oxford English dictionary. This is a website that people come to for information, not opinions. As I said earlier, discriminatory comments about people due to the colour of their skin, is racism, hence why I changed the title.

These are not accusations, they are well documented articles that Dianne Accot has wrote. Rothwell92 (talk) 01:49, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * You are making a judgment that her comments are racist. As you say, Wikipedia articles should not contain your judgment, or that of anyone else. If you can find reliable, independent, published sources that support the specific claim that those particular comments are racist, you are welcome to open a discussion based on those sources on the article talk page. If the consensus of editors supports your opinion, then article can be changed. Otherwise, not. In the meantime, continued disruptive editing will result in you being blocked. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:03, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

I understand completely, point taken. Rothwell92 (talk) 13:11, 13 February 2020 (UTC)