User talk:Rottenriddles

September 2019
Hello, I'm Wham2001. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Vaccination policy seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 19:45, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * To follow up on that, the lead section is supposed to be a neutral summary of the sourced content appearing in the body of the article. You cannot simply replace it with material based on your own opinion.  Best, Wham2001 (talk) 19:46, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Vaccination policy, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 20:02, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

There’s a reason resources weren’t there because I was getting the links for them. Its amazing to me that you jumped right back to the original page when it went against your views, but because it goes against mine I can’t edit it? That makes no sense and the pages are not neutral at all. It’s also extremely offensive to those who have had their children die from vaccinations to say that they are safe. It’s a fact that SB 276 and SB 714 just passed in California and that California no longer has medical exemptions thanks to Senator Pan.


 * Any content on Wikipedia must be verifiable; that is, supported by references to reliable sources, and be a neutral summary of content from mainstream, published sources. That is particularly true of medical content where we have a specific policy dictating that only material that is derived from the highest quality sources may be used.The links in blue in the previous paragraph are some of the more important Wikipedia policies; please read them before making any further edits to the article.  I would suggest that you consider editing a topic about which you feel less strongly to find your feet first before editing about vaccines, which are a controversial medical topic where we expect editors to tread carefully.  If you feel your changes were appropriate you should discuss them on the article talk page, but I don't think you'll get much traction. Wham2001 (talk) 20:43, 11 September 2019 (UTC)