User talk:Roudoudou

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! --Scray (talk) 10:47, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Manual of Style

Discussion of edits
I also wanted to let you know about this discussion. --Scray (talk) 10:47, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Please give an explanation in clear English of what "FibroTest is only valid in strict respect of analytical and pre-analytical recommendations" is supposed to mean on the talk page. I have removed it again. We are writing for our readers, not to satisfy your concerns. Fences &amp;  Windows  01:00, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * "analytical recommandations" of a blood test is a document explaining the conditions needed for performing the blood sample (kind of tube, temperature, handling, etc.). "pre-analytical recommandations" is the document explaining the raw conditions for the test to be interpretable (not acute hepatitis, etc.). Is it more clear ? How can I help ?Biopredictive (talk) 09:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * any hint on this ? Biopredictive (talk) 14:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Username
Your username does not meet Wikipedia's username policy because is an organisation name. Wikipedia editors are not meant to edit on behalf of organisations. If, after reviewing that policy, you believe your username does not violate policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you can file for a change of username, or you can simply create a new account and start using that one instead. Fences &amp;  Windows  01:02, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It was chosen to be perfectly clear and transparent for pages we edit, in order to avoid COI. Do we have to change it ?Biopredictive (talk) 09:49, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I can see the logic in that, but they ain't my rules. An admin could block this account at any time. I won't suggest they do, but it is best if people don't editing on behalf of an organisation. You might also decide that you like Wikipedia and want to contribute outside your direct professional area, in which case a more neutral username would be appropriate. A potential COI can be flagged up on your userpage, it doesn't need to be in the username.  Fences  &amp;  Windows  23:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * understood. I will ask for a username change following the process. Biopredictive (talk) 14:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * process done...just need to wait nowBiopredictive (talk) 14:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Change name
You're sharing your account. Change the name and stop. See comments at WP:CHU. — Rlevse • Talk  • 21:59, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Please read previous discussion : we asked for a change of name following the procedure on 14:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Biopredictive (talk) 09:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)