User talk:Rough Melody

Re from my talk
Howdy, since you apparently added the blog, I removed it as under WP:ELNO under Criteria number 11. You may re-add it if you can show on on Talk:Inception (film) that it does not meet the criteria of #11 The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 23:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, thank you for the welcome message! Personally, I won't add something twice so, I won't add the link again on my own but let me write just a few words why I put that link. I added the link to the article more in a way to provide a further reading article and I read the guideline for Further reading section. Maybe a Further reading section should also comply with the rules for External links section but I still haven't read all the guidelines for all the various topics. In general, my idea was that there were already links on possible interpretations of the ending in the Further reading section of the Inception Wikipedia article but this particular interpretation was not listed on any of the included sources. So, having in mind that "the section should present a balance of various points of view", I decided to include this interpretation. On the other hand, I didn't manage to find it on a more notable location (I had gone through about 50 sites with writings about Inception ending interpetations) thus, I couldn't choose a more notable source to include. It was said on some of the Wikipedia guideline pages that the best approach for editing is to use common sense in the first place, and in this case I decided it was ok to include that link. I thought that non-notablity of the blog in this case did not spoil the content of the article rahter than adding some (maybe not enormous) further reading value to it. It was not written in the guidelines for Further reading section that notability of the source is mandatory and apart from that my intuitive feeling for a "further reading" section was also in the same vein. So, basically that was my idea. Sorry, that it became more than a few words. Rough Melody (talk) 16:06, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Russian Roulette (Triumvirat album)


The article Russian Roulette (Triumvirat album) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not satisfy WP:NALBUM. Has been in CAT:NN for over eleven years, hence the PROD."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – DarkGlow • 20:18, 17 August 2021 (UTC)