User talk:Roughhewnheart

Copyright problems with Roger Holzheimer
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Roger Holzheimer, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Roger Holzheimer appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Roger Holzheimer has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Hqb (talk) 19:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Copyright Problems.
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia! I've deleted both the article Roger Holzheimer and your userpage because they consisted of content taken from this and another website, which indicate that the work is copyrighted. Wikipedia can only accept content which has been explicitly released under the GFDL license, and this content doesn't look to have been. Also, subjects of articles need to meet our notability guidelines, and editors are advised against editing articles with which they have a conflict of interest. Best, – Toon (talk)  20:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)