User talk:Roughrodney

January 2021
Hello, I'm McSly. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. McSly (talk) 15:14, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Attack helicopter. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Attack helicopter was changed by Roughrodney (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860693 on 2021-01-17T15:15:35+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boeing AH-64 Apache. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

April 2023
Hello, I'm Miner Editor. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mike Kovaleski—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Miner Editor (talk) 15:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at You Can't See Me. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Riverbend21 (talk) 15:29, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at You Can't See Me, you may be blocked from editing. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 15:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Maurice Dean Wint. DreamRimmer (talk) 15:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)  You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 07:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)